Today it has been less than a year since I launched project BETSHY. It will be a year old in December. Against all obstacles, I have consistently worked on www.betshy.com arduously in order to grow. And it has been successful. Milestones are being met. I am excited when I debug prospectively. I feel proud of myself.
It is that time of the year. I feel I should reflect on what I have been going through in 2024 now that it is almost ending. I can see the light in the darkness. Its soft sparkle illuminates my sorrow and turns it into gold. Alchemy of the soul. This journey has been difficult.
Yes, 2024 was a difficult year for me. A lot of intense negative events took place, and I became mentally unwell at some point, struggling to cope with the overwhelming challenges that life threw my way. However, despite not being at a 100% in terms of my health, I always found solace in working on my blog, which served as an outlet for my thoughts and emotions during trying times.
The act of writing provided me with a sense of purpose and normalcy, allowing me to channel my inner turmoil into something creative and constructive. This year, I have built the foundations of what will become my new goals, laying the groundwork for a brighter future that I am eager to embrace, filled with renewed passion and a clearer vision for my life and work.
I must admit, it is an honour to be read from so many different countries, and cultures. I want to say thank you to everyone who has read any my posts. I hope you have found it informative, and I welcome new readers. Over a month ago I reached 100K visits to the website. 100K clicks in 28 days means a lot to me, and I am so glad people are reading the madness I write about.
As a sidenote, for those who wonder about my health, and care about me; only be concerned if this page ever stops existing. For as long as I am alive, this website will be kept alive. I am investing my life on it after seeing myself lose many digital assets as a result of discontinued accounts. My assets will be on this website from now on, as the first point of contact. Stay tuned!
Iraq is calling such a decision a “strictly religious move,” which raises significant concerns about the implications for women’s rights and child protection. The Telegraph (Sebouai, 2024) reports: “The governing coalition says the move aligns with a strict interpretation of Islamic law and is intended to protect young girls from ‘immoral relationships,’” but this justification overlooks the potential harms that may arise from such a policy. By lowering the age of consent to nine, the government risks normalising child marriage and perpetuating cycles of abuse, all under the guise of religious adherence.
Critics argue that this approach not only betrays the fundamental rights of women and girls but also ignores the broader global movement towards elevating the age of consent to ensure better protection against exploitation. The ramifications of such a decision could be far-reaching, impacting societal attitudes towards young girls, their education, and their autonomy in an already fragile political climate.
And yes, it makes sense that Islam as a religion takes biased action to justify Muhammad’s issues. There has been much controversy surrounding the marriage of Prophet Muhammad to Aysha, as it is believed that she was only six years old at the time. Many critics of Islam cite this as evidence of the religion’s supposed lack of respect for women’s rights and the age of consent. After all, it’s been a long time that Islamic scholars have been trying to destigmatise and justify Muhammad’s paedophilia.
Nevertheless. everyone knows that girls of that age still do not have the capacity to understand and/or give consent; therefore, subjugating her to a sexual activity would be legalised rape. Furthermore, their physical appearance is undeveloped, they have no breasts or hips. In other words, they still do not look like women. So why are there people who think it is normal or acceptable to desire a defenceless child? How can Iraq come up with such a horrible psychopathology in 2024?
Yes, the great prophet of Islam married a six years old girl, and consummated the marriage when she was nine years old. In some Islamic traditions and interpretations, this is seen as a culturally accepted practice of the time. However, in modern times, many find this age difference concerning and disgusting. Whilst Islamic scholars will say that during the 7th century it was culturally acceptable to marry children, what can they say about Iraq’s “pride” for their paedophilia?
Indeed, Muhammad was—by definition—a paederast. This statement is a controversial and sensitive topic that continues to spark debate in religious and academic circles alike. Iraq’s constitution establishes Islam as the official religion and states that no law can contradict the established provisions of Islam, emphasising the deep intertwining of faith and governance in the region.
Many scholars argue that the founder of Islam truly loved Aysha, portraying their relationship as one built on mutual affection, respect, and companionship, while also highlighting that she was indeed happy with him during their time together. However, this interpretation is not without its critiques, as differing perspectives bring to light the complexities surrounding their union, contextualised by cultural and historical factors of the time, making it a subject worthy of extensive scrutiny and discussion among historians, theologians, and sociologists alike. All this can be questioned when we understand consent and sexual psychology.
Finally, the Telegraph (Sebouai, 2024) also reports that women will have no right to divorce their husbands under any condition, to have child custody, and to have a right to inheritance, which raises significant concerns about women’s autonomy and well-being in society. This lack of legal protections not only perpetuates gender inequality but also places numerous families at risk of destabilisation, as women may find themselves trapped in abusive or unfulfilling marriages without any legal recourse. Moreover, the implications extend beyond individual relationships, threatening the stability of communities as a whole, as the absence of rights for women reinforces a cycle of poverty and lack of opportunity for future generations.
In conclusion, the marriage of Prophet Muhammad to Aysha at a young age is controversial by today’s standards, and Iraq has taken legal and religious action based on Islamic hermaneutics, to attempt to legalise child rape, paederasty, and the subjugation of women. In 2024, this is an extreme and unacceptable move.
On Sunday 10th November, 2024 we had a mass shooting in England (BBC News, 2024). It was the same day we also had a mass stabbing (Sky News, 2024). Both incidents happened in East London. I was lucky to come across the news somehow, but the reality is that neither of these incidents made it to news’ headlines, and were quickly forgotten. Are we starting to get used to these events taking place in this jurisdiction?
Advertisements
That is how it began in the United States. First, everyone saw the headlines of mass shootings taking place every few years. For instance, in April, 1999, the prolific Columbine mass shooting took place (CNN, 2024). It shocked everyone, and the entire world witnessed it. The next mass shooting took place 8 years later. It was also shocking and it was actually larger in its impact. Then, every 2-3 years a mass shooting would take place, until it rose to several incidents per year. Nowadays, people in the US are used to this happening on a daily basis (Knutson, J., Axios, 2023). According to Schroering (2024), nearly 43,000 people were shot and killed last year in the United States and 125 people are, on average, shot and killed every day there.
Back in the Day Mass Shootings Shocked Great Britain
The small city of Plymouth in the United Kingdom was shocked when a mass shooting took place on a quiet summer day in 2021. The perpetrator, Jake Davison, a 22-year-old man with a history of mental health issues, went on a shooting spree, taking the lives of 5 innocent people before turning the gun on himself. Among the victims was his own mother.
It was later revealed that Davison had been struggling with severe depression and feelings of isolation for years. He had a troubled childhood, marked by neglect and abuse, which had left deep scars on his psyche. Despite numerous attempts to seek help, Davidson’s mental health deteriorated to the point where he felt he had no other option but to lash out in violence.
The tragic incident in Plymouth shed light on the need for better mental health support and interventions for individuals like Davison who are at risk of harming themselves or others. It also sparked a debate on gun control laws in the UK, as Davison had obtained his weapon legally before carrying out the attack.
In the aftermath of the shooting, the community of Plymouth came together to support the families of the victims and to advocate for better mental health resources in the city. The case of Jake Davison serves as a sobering reminder of the devastating consequences that can occur when mental health issues are not properly addressed and when individuals are able to access firearms without adequate screening and oversight.
Gun Violence in the UK Nowadays 🩸
In the last year, mass shootings have become a disturbingly prevalent occurrence in the UK, leaving many wondering why this trend has escalated. While the UK has historically had strict gun control measures in place, mass shootings have still managed to make their way onto the nation’s headlines with alarming frequency.
Play
There are several factors that may contribute to the rise of mass shootings in the UK. One possible reason is the glorification of violence in the media, which can desensitise individuals to the consequences of using guns in violent acts. The portrayal of guns as a symbol of power and dominance in popular culture can inadvertently influence vulnerable individuals to seek out firearms as a means of asserting control over others.
Another factor that may be contributing to the prevalence of mass shootings in the UK is the issue of mental health. Many of the perpetrators of mass shootings in the UK have been found to have a history of mental illness or emotional instability. Despite efforts to improve mental health services in the UK, there is still a stigma surrounding mental health issues that can prevent individuals from seeking help before it is too late.
In addition, social and economic factors may also play a role in the increase of mass shootings in the UK. Disenfranchised individuals who feel marginalised by society may turn to violence as a means of expressing their frustrations and gaining attention. Economic disparities and lack of access to education and opportunities can also contribute to feelings of hopelessness and desperation that may drive individuals to commit violent acts.
While there is no one-size-fits-all solution to addressing the rise of mass shootings in the UK, it is clear that a multifaceted approach is necessary. Stricter gun control measures, increased funding for mental health services, and efforts to address social and economic inequalities are all important steps that can be taken to help prevent future tragedies.
Final Thoughts
As it can be seen, what first seemed to be a sensationalist headline, became secondary news due to its prevalence and frequency. Is this now happening in the United Kingdom? Even more worrying is the fact that these types of incidents are becoming prevalent in every continent. Is there a forensic mental health pandemic? When will forensic mental health be taken seriously enough to get the World Health Organisation (WHO) involved in the mitigation of this epidemiology?
Ultimately, it is crucial for the UK government and society as a whole to come together to address the root causes of mass shootings and work towards creating a safer and more secure nation for all its citizens. Only by addressing the underlying issues that contribute to violence can we hope to prevent future mass shootings in the UK.
Censorship has made its way into my life. I can no longer deny that weird things are happening on the Internet, and also outside the Internet in relation to behaviours online. Just when I thought I was immune to this emerging two-tier culture; I was a victim of it.
Advertisements
Here in the United Kingdom, one can observe the criminal justice system’s desperate attempt to make space in prisons for those who express their opinions against Islam and against illegal migration online. However, as many have posited; there seems to be a two-tier systemic bias which leaves a selected few impune (e.g. paedophiles and rapists), whilst other groups are harshly punished for doing minor offences.
The criminal justice system of England is so overwhelmed, that there have been initiatives to take house arrests to the next level of crime and punishment, due to overcrowded prisons (Syal, R., The Guardian, 2014). Anti-Islam activists and journalists are being imprisoned callously, whilst antisemitic behaviours are hypernormalised, and not prosecuted.
For instance, I believe that Youtube was antisemitic against my channel. They charged me with spam allegations after I uploaded a video of my new Tanakh (a sacred religious book), where I expressed excitement in regards to learning Hebrew and Judaism. The video lasted about a minute, and was certainly not spam. I find Youtube’s decision to be antisemitic, and it confirms that antisemitism is systemically and culturally ingrained in modern times.
All this means that I will have to create my own video gallery, and that I cannot be trusting other websites to look after my digital legacy in any way. What I had built for so many years was quickly destroyed by Youtube, and whilst I feel devastated by these actions; I am now more determined than ever to redirect my energy into my website, where I rule, and where I decide what’s acceptable or not.
I also know that Youtube is openly Russophobic and has actively banned prolific Russian channels such as Russia Today (RT), who had to also create their own video gallery as a result. It is certainly terrifying to see how Google has some corruption in its structure. This type of scenario might be why a Russian court fined Google with $20 decillion (RT, 2024). The scope of the damages is enormous, and the direct discrimination against demonised social groups such as the Russian people, and the Jewish people is undeniable.
Whilst my single case will never make it to newspaper headlines, it is still notable that Youtube has acted in Nazi ways to ethnically cleanse the digital space, and I am one of those people who have been unjustly censored for having Jewish and/or Russian content. This means I will have to start from zero, and all of my followers were lost. I will notify you, dear readers, when I have a video gallery ready again.
Identity politics is a topic that has been increasingly at the forefront of political discussions in recent years. It has become increasingly prominent in the social and political spheres. Defined as a political approach that focuses on the political interests and perspectives of groups with which people identify, such as race, gender, class, and sexuality; woke politics has sparked both support and antagonism. One aspect of identity politics that has sparked controversy and debate is the concept of trans-racial identity.
Advertisements
I still remember when the term “woke” began to be used. My first reaction was that such a word was wrong, because the correct term should be “awake”. I disliked it prima facie as a result of this, but never did I imagine it would become so complicated in politics that the word appears on the media all the time when extreme or ludicrous cases related to identity politics come up. Over the years, however, I have come to understand that language evolves, and that new terms often emerge from cultural shifts and social movements.
The increased frequency of the usage of the term “woke” in discussions about social justice and equity made me realise that “woke” encompasses much more than just a simple play on words; it reflects a growing awareness of systemic issues and the need for meaningful change. Despite my initial misgivings, I now acknowledge the significance of this term in sparking dialogue around topics that are often uncomfortable yet necessary for progress in society. It is fascinating how a single word can encapsulate complex ideas and perspectives, leading to both passionate advocacy and stark polarisation within the public sphere.
One of the most controversial, ‘woke’ concepts to have emerged was the idea of “trans-racial” identity. Trans-racial identity refers to a person who identifies as a different race or ethnicity than the one they were assigned at birth. This concept gained widespread attention in 2015 when Rachel Dolezal, a white woman who had been passing as black for years, was exposed and faced intense scrutiny and backlash. Dolezal’s case brought the question of trans-racial identity to the forefront and ignited a heated debate on the validity of such identities.
Proponents of identity politics argue that it is an essential tool for social justice and equality. By centring the experiences and perspectives of marginalised groups, identity politics seeks to address the systemic inequalities and discrimination that these groups face. It also aims to amplify the voices of those who have historically been silenced or ignored in mainstream political discourse. Nevertheless, trans-racial identities challenge the very security of any jurisdiction.
For instance, imagine if a man from Yemen crossed the English Channel and boldly asserted, “Hey, I identify as indigenous English, therefore you should give me the right to enter and abode this jurisdiction.” This way, any terrorist, or paedophile could easily make his entrance into the United Kingdom under the convoluted politics of trans-racial identity, leading to significant security concerns and potential threats to public safety.
Critics argue that such claims undermine the very fabric of national identity and social cohesion, as they blur the lines between genuine cultural heritage and a superficial claim to identity. This is precisely why it is very difficult, if not impossible, for trans-racial identity to be recognised or acknowledged by the broader society. Furthermore, critics of trans-racial identity posit that one’s racial identity is determined by ancestry and lived experiences. They argue that individuals cannot simply “identify” as a different race based on their own feelings or desires. This viewpoint is often rooted in the belief that racial identity is fixed and immutable, and that individuals should not appropriate or co-opt the experiences of marginalised racial groups, especially when coming from a privileged position. .
Dolezal’s case ignited fury in the black community, as many felt that her actions trivialised their struggles and experiences, while even the transgender community expressed feelings of insult and betrayal by her alleged dysphoria. In fact, her actions are perceived as inherently racist, sparking debates about privilege, appropriation, and the ethical implications of claiming an identity that is not one’s own. The discourse surrounding this issue is complex, weaving through themes of race, identity politics, and the essence of belonging in a globally connected yet deeply divided world.
On the other hand, proponents of trans-racial identity argue that race is fluid and can be a deeply personal and subjective aspect of one’s identity. They argue that individuals should have the autonomy to define their own racial identity based on their personal experiences, connections, and cultural affiliations. Proponents also point to cases of trans-racial adoption, where children of one race are raised by parents of a different race, as examples of how racial identity can be complex and multifaceted.
Moreover, some people are against identity politics whatsoever, arguing that it can be divisive and counterproductive. Some believe that prioritising group identities over shared values and beliefs can lead to polarisation and conflict. Others argue that identity politics can essentialise and stereotype individuals based on their race, gender, or other identities, rather than recognising their unique experiences and perspectives.
While the concept of trans-racial identity remains controversial, it is important to approach this topic with nuance and sensitivity. As society becomes more diverse and interconnected, it is crucial to acknowledge and address the unique challenges and experiences faced by different groups. It is essential to listen to the perspectives and experiences of individuals who identify as trans-racial, while also acknowledging the complexities and histories of race and racism that shape our understanding of identity. Ultimately, discussions surrounding trans-racial identity highlight the fluid and evolving nature of identity politics and the importance of approaching these conversations with an open mind and a willingness to learn and grow.
Have you ever wondered how the IQ (intelligence quotient) works and what it actually measures? IQ is a commonly used measure of intelligence, but many people may not fully understand how it is calculated and what it indicates about a person’s cognitive abilities.
Advertisements
IQ tests are designed to assess a person’s cognitive abilities in areas such as problem-solving, reasoning, memory, and verbal comprehension. The tests consist of a series of questions that measure these abilities and are scored based on how well a person performs compared to others in their age group.
The average IQ score is typically set at 100, with scores above 100 indicating above-average intelligence and scores below 100 indicating below-average intelligence. The distribution of IQ scores follows a bell curve, with the majority of people scoring around the average of 100.
IQ tests are standardised, meaning that the questions and scoring system are consistent across different tests and populations. This allows for comparisons to be made between individuals and across different groups. However, it is important to note that IQ tests do have their limitations and are not a perfect measure of intelligence.
One criticism of IQ tests is that they may not accurately capture the full range of human intelligence, as they tend to focus on certain cognitive abilities and may not account for other factors that contribute to intelligence, such as creativity or emotional intelligence.
It is also important to consider that intelligence is a complex and multifaceted trait that is influenced by a combination of genetic and environmental factors. While IQ tests can provide some insight into a person’s cognitive abilities, they should not be the sole measure of a person’s intelligence or potential.
In conclusion, IQ tests are a useful tool for assessing certain aspects of cognitive abilities, but they are not the be-all and end-all of intelligence. It is important to take a holistic approach to understanding intelligence and to recognise that each individual has their own unique strengths and abilities that go beyond a single number on a test.
In July 2018, the small town of Amesbury, England was rocked by a shocking incident – Dawn Sturgess, a 44-year-old woman, fell ill after coming into contact with a deadly nerve agent known as Novichok. She tragically passed away just days later, leaving her friends and family devastated.
Advertisements
The poisoning of Dawn Sturgess was widely believed to be linked to a previous incident just a few months earlier, in which a former Russian spy and his daughter were also poisoned with Novichok in the nearby city of Salisbury. The UK government and international allies were quick to blame Russia for the attacks, leading to a diplomatic crisis between the two countries.
However, as more details of the case emerged, a disturbing theory began to take shape – that the UK government was actually responsible for the poisoning of Dawn Sturgess. The evidence supporting this theory is extensive and compelling.
Firstly, it is important to note that Novichok is an extremely rare and deadly nerve agent that is believed to be only produced by a few select countries, including Russia. The idea that a random person in a small town in England would come into contact with such a dangerous substance by chance is highly unlikely.
Furthermore, it was discovered that Dawn Sturgess had come into contact with the Novichok nerve agent by handling a contaminated perfume bottle that was found in a park near her home. This raises serious questions about how such a dangerous substance ended up in a public place, and why the UK government was unable to prevent its spread.
Additionally, it is worth noting that the poisoning of Dawn Sturgess occurred just days before President Trump’s visit to the UK, leading some to speculate that the incident was orchestrated to garner sympathy and support for the government in the face of criticism. This tragic event not only shocked the local community but also raised concerns about national security, as it highlighted the vulnerabilities within the country regarding foreign threats. Some observers argued that the timing of the poisoning was too coincidental to dismiss, believing it served as a calculated move to divert attention from ongoing political issues at home.
As discussions intensified, media outlets began to analyse the implications of such incidents on international relations, further fuelling debates about the motivations behind the attack and its potential use as a political tool. The combination of heightened tensions and public outcry created a complex landscape for both the UK government and international leaders, forcing them to navigate a delicate balance between addressing pressing security concerns and maintaining diplomatic ties.
Finally, the UK government’s handling of the case raised further suspicions among the public and international observers. They were quick to blame Russia without providing concrete evidence to back their claims, leading many to question the motivations behind such an assertion. Additionally, the investigation into the matter was shrouded in secrecy, with numerous details kept from the public eye, which only intensified pre-existing concerns.
The lack of transparency and accountability in the government’s response not only left citizens feeling uneasy but also fuelled widespread speculation about potential collusion or complicity in the poisoning incident. As expert opinions varied and conspiracy theories spread like wildfire, the government’s failure to clarify its position and communicate effectively with the public further complicated the narrative surrounding this alarming case.
In conclusion, the case of Dawn Sturgess’ Novichok poisoning raises serious questions about the UK government’s role in the incident. The evidence supporting the theory that they were responsible is bigger in scope than the evidence blaming Russia, and their handling of the case only adds to the suspicion. It is imperative that a thorough and independent investigation be conducted to uncover the truth behind this tragic event.
