Dear readers, it is with a measured composure that I recount the chapters of my early life in Britain, not as a lament, but as a testament to the unyielding spirit that has propelled me forward. Born amidst the vibrant hues of Colombia, my existence was irrevocably altered when my then stepfather, under the guise of benevolence, orchestrated my horror. As I write this, it is 3rd November, 2025. It’s 22:50 and I am filling a form to access my medical records from the NHS. I am being asked to provide my full list of addresses where I have lived, and I had to Google the postcodes as I did not recall these. I came across the farm business the man who once adopted me owns, and I felt that I had to write about those times between 2006-2007 to finally let go and heal.
Advertisements
Subscribe to get access
Read more of this content when you subscribe today.
In 2025, Donald Trump, back as U.S. President, has introduced a set of trade policies called “reciprocal tariffs.” These tariffs are taxes on goods coming into the U.S., designed to match what other countries charge the U.S. for its exports. The idea is to make trade “fair” in Trump’s view, by protecting American businesses and jobs. But these changes aren’t just about the U.S.—they’re sending ripples across the world, and the UK is feeling the impact. Let’s break down what these tariffs are, how they’ll hit the UK, and what it might mean for everyday people and the economy.
Advertisements
What Are Trump’s Reciprocal Tariffs?
First, let’s get the basics. A tariff is like a fee a country puts on stuff it imports—like cars, food, or steel. Trump’s plan, rolled out in April 2025, starts with a 10% tariff on everything the U.S. buys from other countries, kicking in on April 5. Then, on April 9, he’s adding extra tariffs on specific countries based on how much they sell to the U.S. compared to what they buy back. For example, China gets hit with a whopping 54% tariff, the European Union (EU) gets 20%, and the UK faces a 10% rate—though some worry it could climb higher later.
Trump says this is about fairness. He argues that countries like the UK charge the U.S. too much for its goods (like through taxes like VAT), while the U.S. has been too soft in return. He also wants to bring manufacturing back to America by making foreign goods pricier. But here’s the catch: these tariffs don’t just affect U.S. shoppers—they change things for countries like the UK that sell to the U.S.
How Does the UK Trade with the U.S.?
The UK and U.S. are big trading buddies. The UK sends over £60 billion worth of goods to the U.S. every year—think luxury cars like Rolls-Royce, whisky from Scotland, and medicines from companies like AstraZeneca. In return, the UK buys stuff like tech gadgets, food, and energy from the U.S. This back-and-forth supports jobs and keeps prices steady. But Trump’s tariffs are shaking things up.
Direct Hit: Higher Costs for UK Exports
The most obvious effect is on UK businesses that sell to the U.S. Starting April 5, 2025, that 10% tariff means American companies importing UK goods—like a £100,000 Aston Martin—will pay an extra £10,000 to the U.S. government. That’s a big jump. Some U.S. buyers might swallow the cost, but many will either pass it on to American customers (making UK goods pricier) or just buy less from the UK. For industries like car manufacturing, where 18% of UK car exports go to the U.S., this could mean fewer sales and maybe even job cuts.
Take whisky as another example. Scotland’s whisky industry sends a lot to the U.S.—it’s a huge market. A 10% tariff might not sound like much on a £50 bottle, adding just £5, but if American shops and bars start buying less because of the extra cost, that hits Scottish distilleries hard. Experts reckon sectors like this could see exports drop by up to a fifth if the tariffs stick.
Knock-On Effects: Prices and Jobs in the UK
So, what does this mean for people in the UK? Well, it’s not just about exports. If UK companies lose U.S. customers, they might have to cut costs—sometimes by laying off workers. Car factories, whisky makers, and even drug companies could feel the pinch. Fewer jobs mean less money floating around in towns that rely on these industries.
Then there’s the flip side: goods coming into the UK from the U.S. Right now, the UK hasn’t slapped tariffs back on U.S. imports, hoping to keep talks friendly and maybe dodge worse tariffs later. But if the UK does retaliate—say, with a 10% tax on American iPhones or beef—prices here could rise. A £500 phone could jump to £550, and that’s before shops add their own markup. Food prices might creep up too, especially if trade gets messier.
The Bigger Picture: Economic Growth Takes a Hit
The UK’s economy isn’t in great shape to start with—growth is slow, and the government’s trying to balance its books. Trump’s tariffs could make things trickier. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) warned that if the U.S. and others keep raising tariffs, UK growth could shrink by 0.6% this year and 1% next year. That’s billions of pounds lost. Another group, the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR), thinks the damage could be even worse—up to 3% less growth over five years.
Why? Because when trade slows, everything slows. Less money comes into the UK from exports, and businesses get nervous about investing. Plus, if the U.S. economy stumbles under its own tariff costs (more on that later), it’ll buy less from everyone, including the UK. It’s like a domino effect.
Inflation and Interest Rates: A Balancing Act
Here’s where it gets personal for UK households. Tariffs can push prices up—economists call this inflation. If UK businesses struggle and goods get pricier, people might demand higher wages to keep up. That could force the Bank of England to keep interest rates high (they’re at 4.5% now) to stop prices spiralling. High rates mean pricier mortgages and loans, but better returns for savers. The Bank’s already hinted tariffs are making them cautious about cutting rates soon.
On the other hand, some say prices might drop at first. If countries like China can’t sell to the U.S. because of huge tariffs, they might send cheap steel or gadgets to the UK instead. That could be a short-term win for shoppers, but it’d hurt UK companies trying to compete.
The Pound and Global Trade Chaos
The pound’s value could wobble too. When trade gets rocky, investors get jittery, and the pound might fall against the dollar. A weaker pound makes imports—like oil or tech—costlier, adding more pressure on prices. It’s a bit of a vicious circle.
Globally, Trump’s tariffs are sparking a trade war. The EU’s already planning £22 billion in counter-tariffs on U.S. goods like jeans and whiskey. If the UK gets dragged in, it could face a tough choice: side with the U.S. for a better deal, or stick closer to the EU, its biggest market. Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s trying to play it cool, pushing for a U.S. trade deal to soften the blow, but it’s a gamble.
Winners and Losers in the UK
Not everyone’s affected the same way. Big UK drug firms like GSK, which get 40-50% of sales from the U.S., might struggle with tariffs on ingredients crossing borders. Luxury car makers could lose out if American buyers switch to homegrown brands. But some UK businesses—like clothing makers—might see a tiny boost if U.S. shoppers turn to British brands over pricier EU ones.
For regular people, it’s mostly bad news. Higher prices at the shop, fewer jobs in some areas, and maybe a bumpier economy overall. Pension pots could take a hit too, since many are tied to stock markets that tanked after Trump’s announcement—think 4-6% drops in a day.
What’s Next?
The UK government’s in a tight spot. Starmer’s team wants to avoid a trade war, but if Trump hikes tariffs further—say, to 20% because of the UK’s 20% VAT—they might have to fight back. Talks for a U.S.-UK trade deal are ongoing, but there’s no guarantee they’ll dodge the worst. Meanwhile, businesses are bracing for a rocky 2025, and households might need to tighten their belts.
In short, Trump’s 2025 reciprocal tariffs are a big deal for the UK. They’ll likely mean higher costs, slower growth, and some tough times ahead. It’s not all doom—there could be short-term bargains—but the overall vibe is uncertainty. How it all shakes out depends on how the UK, U.S., and the world play their next moves. For now, it’s a waiting game with real stakes for everyone.
On Sunday 10th November, 2024 we had a mass shooting in England (BBC News, 2024). It was the same day we also had a mass stabbing (Sky News, 2024). Both incidents happened in East London. I was lucky to come across the news somehow, but the reality is that neither of these incidents made it to news’ headlines, and were quickly forgotten. Are we starting to get used to these events taking place in this jurisdiction?
Advertisements
That is how it began in the United States. First, everyone saw the headlines of mass shootings taking place every few years. For instance, in April, 1999, the prolific Columbine mass shooting took place (CNN, 2024). It shocked everyone, and the entire world witnessed it. The next mass shooting took place 8 years later. It was also shocking and it was actually larger in its impact. Then, every 2-3 years a mass shooting would take place, until it rose to several incidents per year. Nowadays, people in the US are used to this happening on a daily basis (Knutson, J., Axios, 2023). According to Schroering (2024), nearly 43,000 people were shot and killed last year in the United States and 125 people are, on average, shot and killed every day there.
Back in the Day Mass Shootings Shocked Great Britain
The small city of Plymouth in the United Kingdom was shocked when a mass shooting took place on a quiet summer day in 2021. The perpetrator, Jake Davison, a 22-year-old man with a history of mental health issues, went on a shooting spree, taking the lives of 5 innocent people before turning the gun on himself. Among the victims was his own mother.
It was later revealed that Davison had been struggling with severe depression and feelings of isolation for years. He had a troubled childhood, marked by neglect and abuse, which had left deep scars on his psyche. Despite numerous attempts to seek help, Davidson’s mental health deteriorated to the point where he felt he had no other option but to lash out in violence.
The tragic incident in Plymouth shed light on the need for better mental health support and interventions for individuals like Davison who are at risk of harming themselves or others. It also sparked a debate on gun control laws in the UK, as Davison had obtained his weapon legally before carrying out the attack.
In the aftermath of the shooting, the community of Plymouth came together to support the families of the victims and to advocate for better mental health resources in the city. The case of Jake Davison serves as a sobering reminder of the devastating consequences that can occur when mental health issues are not properly addressed and when individuals are able to access firearms without adequate screening and oversight.
In the last year, mass shootings have become a disturbingly prevalent occurrence in the UK, leaving many wondering why this trend has escalated. While the UK has historically had strict gun control measures in place, mass shootings have still managed to make their way onto the nation’s headlines with alarming frequency.
There are several factors that may contribute to the rise of mass shootings in the UK. One possible reason is the glorification of violence in the media, which can desensitise individuals to the consequences of using guns in violent acts. The portrayal of guns as a symbol of power and dominance in popular culture can inadvertently influence vulnerable individuals to seek out firearms as a means of asserting control over others.
Another factor that may be contributing to the prevalence of mass shootings in the UK is the issue of mental health. Many of the perpetrators of mass shootings in the UK have been found to have a history of mental illness or emotional instability. Despite efforts to improve mental health services in the UK, there is still a stigma surrounding mental health issues that can prevent individuals from seeking help before it is too late.
In addition, social and economic factors may also play a role in the increase of mass shootings in the UK. Disenfranchised individuals who feel marginalised by society may turn to violence as a means of expressing their frustrations and gaining attention. Economic disparities and lack of access to education and opportunities can also contribute to feelings of hopelessness and desperation that may drive individuals to commit violent acts.
While there is no one-size-fits-all solution to addressing the rise of mass shootings in the UK, it is clear that a multifaceted approach is necessary. Stricter gun control measures, increased funding for mental health services, and efforts to address social and economic inequalities are all important steps that can be taken to help prevent future tragedies.
Final Thoughts
As it can be seen, what first seemed to be a sensationalist headline, became secondary news due to its prevalence and frequency. Is this now happening in the United Kingdom? Even more worrying is the fact that these types of incidents are becoming prevalent in every continent. Is there a forensic mental health pandemic? When will forensic mental health be taken seriously enough to get the World Health Organisation (WHO) involved in the mitigation of this epidemiology?
Ultimately, it is crucial for the UK government and society as a whole to come together to address the root causes of mass shootings and work towards creating a safer and more secure nation for all its citizens. Only by addressing the underlying issues that contribute to violence can we hope to prevent future mass shootings in the UK.
The Plymouth City Council scandal has been revealed.The council is being investigated by the district auditor over claims that it “falsified” documents to make it look like it had improved its performance.The council has denied any wrongdoing.The allegations were first reported by the Plymouth Herald.The BBC has seen documents which suggest the council doctored documents to make it look like it had improved its performance.The documents, seen by the BBC, show the council was given a “green” rating for its performance in 2012/13, but this was later changed to “amber”.The council has denied any wrongdoing.Plymouth City Council is in financial trouble, with a deficit of ÂŁ1.5 million. This is due to a number of factors, including overspending on children’s services, adult social care and housing. The council is also facing cuts to its government grant.
DELUSIONAL ECONOMY?
This financial crisis has been worsened by the discovery of a ÂŁ250,000 black hole of unaccounted-for spending. It appears that money was allocated to projects approved by the council, but no records were kept of where the money was actually spent.
An investigation by the audit commissioner has revealed gross mismanagement and a lack of financial controls throughout the council.
The town hall has now been closed and all council staff have been suspended, pending an investigation.
This is a shocking scandal and raises questions about the financial management
Plymouth City Council is investigating a leak of confidential information about its children’s services.The authority has referred the matter to the Information Commissioner’s Office and the police.The council said the information related to a small number of cases and had been passed to the media.It said there would be an internal investigation into the leak and “appropriate action” would be taken if any member of staff was found to be responsible.Council leader Ian Bowyer said: “This is a serious matter as the information that has been shared relates to some of our most vulnerable children.“An initial assessment indicates that the information relates to a small number of cases, which are already the subject of public scrutiny.“However, I have referred the matter to the Information Commissioner’s Office and the police to assess whether any further action is required.“There will be an internal investigation into the leak and, if any member of staff is found to be responsible, there will be appropriate action taken.”
The reports, which were published in local newspapers and by the Plymouth Herald, revealed that the council had secretly awarded a discretionary fund of £106,000 to a charity that employed the mayor’s daughter.
The story raised questions about the decision-making process, with councillors facing criticism for their lack of transparency. It also brought into question the long-standing relationship between the mayor and the charity, in particular the grant from the discretionary fund.
The investigation is being overseen by a panel of independent consultants, while the Information Commissioner
Plymouth City Council confirmed that it had been the subject of a data leak after an employee emailed a large amount of personal data to their personal email account.The data included contact details, dates of birth and national insurance numbers of around 2,400 people.Plymouth City Council apologised for the leak and said it was taking steps to prevent a repeat of the incident. The Scottish Prison Service (SPS) was fined £100,000 after a data breach that exposed the personal details of up to 3,500 prisoners. The SPS breach occurred when an SPS employee emailed a “significant quantity” of personal data to their personal email account.The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) found that the SPS had failed to take appropriate technical and organisational measures to protect the personal data of prisoners and had failed to ensure that its employees were trained in data protection.