Tag: Self-Esteem

  • Acquired Traumatic & Traumatised Narcissism

    Acquired Traumatic & Traumatised Narcissism

    Subscribe to continue reading

    Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.

  • How to Love Oneself More

    How to Love Oneself More

    Advertisements

    1. Practise self-care: Taking care of yourself is essential to feeling loved and valued. Make time for activities that bring you joy and relaxation, whether it’s going for a walk, reading a book, or taking a long bath. Prioritise your well-being and address your basic needs so that you can feel your best.

    2. Challenge negative self-talk: We are often our own worst critics, constantly putting ourselves down and comparing ourselves to others. Challenge these negative thoughts and replace them with positive affirmations. Remind yourself of your strengths and accomplishments, and treat yourself with the same kindness and compassion that you would offer to a friend.

    3. Set boundaries: Learning to set boundaries in your relationships is a key component of self-love. It’s important to protect your energy and prioritise your needs, even if it means saying no to others. Surround yourself with people who respect and appreciate you for who you are, and let go of relationships that make you feel small or unimportant.

    4. Practise gratitude: Cultivating a sense of gratitude for all that you have in your life can help you to appreciate yourself more fully. Take time each day to reflect on the things you are thankful for, whether it’s your health, your loved ones, or the beauty of nature. Gratitude can help shift your focus from what is lacking in your life to all that is abundant and wonderful.

    5. Seek support: Sometimes, loving yourself more requires the help and guidance of others. Consider reaching out to a therapist, counsellor, or support group to work through any issues that are holding you back from fully loving yourself. Surround yourself with people who uplift and empower you, and who remind you of your inherent worthiness.

    Remember, loving yourself is a journey that takes time and effort. Be patient with yourself as you work towards cultivating more self-love in your life. By practising self-care, challenging negative self-talk, setting boundaries, practising gratitude, and seeking support, you can learn to love yourself more deeply and fully. You deserve to feel loved and cherished, starting with the love you show yourself.

  • Foundations of Healthy Self-Esteem: Building a Strong, Positive Self-Image

    Foundations of Healthy Self-Esteem: Building a Strong, Positive Self-Image

    Advertisements

    But what exactly is self-esteem, and how can we cultivate a healthy and positive self-image? In this blog post, we will explore the foundations of healthy self-esteem and highlight strategies for building a strong and confident sense of self.

    Understanding Self-Esteem

    Self-esteem is the overall evaluation of our worth and value as individuals. It is not merely about feeling good or being free from self-doubt, but rather the belief in our inherent self-worth. It goes beyond temporary successes or failures, transcending external validation and relying on our internal evaluation.

    Building Blocks of Healthy Self-Esteem

    1. Self-Acceptance: The first step towards healthy self-esteem is accepting ourselves as we are, with all our strengths and flaws. Embracing our imperfections and acknowledging that nobody is perfect allows us to let go of harsh self-judgement and unrealistic expectations. Practising self-acceptance is a journey that involves compassion and kindness towards ourselves.

    2. Positive Self-Talk: Our thoughts have a powerful impact on our self-esteem. Paying attention to our self-talk and replacing negative or self-deprecating statements with positive, affirming thoughts can be transformative. Cultivating an internal dialogue that supports and uplifts us can enhance our self-belief and reinforce a positive self-image.

    3. Setting Realistic Goals: Setting and achieving realistic goals can boost our self-esteem. Break down larger objectives into smaller, achievable tasks, and celebrate each milestone along the way. This helps us develop a sense of efficacy and self-confidence, showing us that we are capable of success.

    4. Surrounding Ourselves with Positivity: The people we surround ourselves with can significantly impact our self-esteem. Seek out supportive and encouraging individuals who inspire and uplift us. Surrounding ourselves with positive role models and like-minded individuals can foster a sense of belonging and support our growth.

    5. Practise Self-Care: Prioritising self-care is paramount in building healthy self-esteem. Engage in activities that nourish your mind, body, and soul. This could include practising mindfulness, exercising, engaging in hobbies, getting enough sleep, and taking time for relaxation. Taking care of ourselves sends a powerful message that we value our well-being, reinforcing our self-worth.

    6. Celebrating Personal Achievements: Acknowledge and celebrate your accomplishments, no matter how big or small. Recognise your strengths, talents, and capabilities. Reflecting on your achievements cultivates a sense of pride and confidence, laying a solid foundation for healthy self-esteem.

    7. Embracing Failure as Growth: Failure is a natural part of life, and how we perceive and respond to it can shape our self-esteem. Instead of viewing failure as a reflection of our self-worth, reframe it as an opportunity for growth and learning. Embracing failure with a growth mindset allows us to bounce back stronger and more resilient, reinforcing our confidence in ourselves.

    Final Thoughts

    Cultivating healthy self-esteem is an ongoing and lifelong journey. It requires dedication, self-reflection, and practice. By embracing self-acceptance, positive self-talk, setting realistic goals, surrounding ourselves with positivity, practising self-care, celebrating achievements, and embracing failure as growth, we can lay the foundations for a strong and positive self-image.

    Remember, you are worthy, capable, and deserving of healthy self-esteem. Invest in yourself, nurture your self-worth, and watch as your confidence flourishes, allowing you to live a more fulfilling and authentic life.

    Advertisements
  • Ego Libido: Balancing Self-Importance and Healthy Self-Esteem

    Ego Libido: Balancing Self-Importance and Healthy Self-Esteem

    Advertisements

    Understanding Ego Libido

    Ego libido refers to the vital energy or psychic fuel that propels our pursuits and motivates us towards achieving our goals . It is an integral component of our ego – the part of our personality that mediates between our unconscious desires and external reality. While ego libido can manifest in various facets of our lives, its expression is often most noticeable in our pursuits for personal achievement, recognition, and ambition.

    Balancing Self-Importance and Healthy Self-Esteem

    Ego libido plays a crucial role in the development and maintenance of a healthy self-esteem. It drives us to strive for personal growth, pushes us to surpass our limits, and enables us to capitalise on opportunities for success. However, an excessive focus on self-importance or an exaggerated sense of superiority can lead to negative consequences.

    1. Building and Maintaining Healthy Self-Esteem:

    By harnessing the energy of ego libido, we can build a foundation of healthy self-esteem. Recognising our strengths, setting realistic goals, and taking pride in our accomplishments can boost self-confidence and foster a positive self-image. A balanced ego libido empowers us to embrace challenges and overcome setbacks, equipping us with the resilience needed to navigate the complexities of life.

    2. Avoiding Narcissism and Entitlement:

    An excessive ego libido, however, can give rise to narcissistic tendencies and a sense of entitlement, leading to inflated self-worth and difficult interpersonal relationships. It is crucial to practice self-awareness, empathy, and gratitude, ensuring that our ego libido does not overshadow the value of humility and compassion.

    3. Nurturing Personal Relationships:

    Maintaining healthy interpersonal relationships requires acknowledging the presence of ego libido. Its careful management can prevent conflicts arising from an overpowering need to be right, maintain control, or assert dominance. Balancing the needs of self with those of others allows for authentic connections while preserving a healthy ego.

    Conclusion

    Ego libido, although often misunderstood, is an integral part of our psyche that drives us to succeed and experience personal growth. Managing this instinctual energy is necessary to strike a balance between self-importance and healthy self-esteem. By nurturing self-awareness and adopting a mindful approach, we can harness the energy of our ego libido to propel us towards success while fostering harmonious relationships and a fulfilling life journey.

    Advertisements
  • Understanding Self-esteem and Why it is Important

    Understanding Self-esteem and Why it is Important

    According to the online Etymology dictionary (n.d.) , the verb “esteem” originates from 14c Latin meaning “to value, determine the value of, appraise”. Based on this definition, to self-esteem is to self-appraise and to consequently establish one’s own self worth. Nevertheless, in psychological research, the concept of self-esteem is a much disputed one. It encompasses other key terms such as self concept (the awareness a person has about themselves), and self-efficacy in relation to the status quo (the way a person assesses their own abilities and skills; Mahendran, 2015).  Is self-esteem a cognitive attitude or a relational phenomenon? Some of these terms will be explored further below, in order to analyse the psycholinguistics and psychodynamics of everyday self-appraisal, and how this reveals the way someone understands and relates to the world around them. 

    Self-esteem is an everyday psychological phenomenon that permeates all aspects of a person’s life. Psychologists have at times described this concept as one that encompasses all types of attitudes an individual has about themselves (Mahendran, 2015, p. 159). Now, in order to understand how this concept might influence everyday executive functions, it would be helpful to first elucidate what is meant in psychology by the word “attitude” in relation to “self”. According to Mahendran (2015), an attitude has three core components: the cognitive component encompasses the way in which an individual sees their own object, that is, themselves. The affective component explores the feelings an individual has towards their own object. And third, the behavioural component encompasses the general views an individual has about their own identity, and how this perceived identity shapes the person’s behaviour within the public environment. The following paragraphs will elaborate on the cognitive and relational aspects of self-appraisal as an attitude and behaviour. Furthermore, labelling theory proposes that the ‘self’ is socially constructed, and such construal determines what is labelled as ‘deviant’ or ‘criminal’, or ‘normal’  (Blackburn, 2005). This would suggest that by evaluating one’s understanding of the self-concept (including its historical biography), and its relations to the world around it (the episodic map); one can gain a more accurate understanding of what it means to self-esteem. Furthermore, Tafarodi and Milne (2002) cited in Mahendran (2015, p. 178) described self-esteem as having two main components: self-competence and self-liking. Based on this construct, it can be said that a person’s subjective definition of competency, and the mores shaping their milieu and SUPEREGO ; contribute to what a person considers worthy, desirable, and acceptable. In correlation, James (1952) cited in Mahendran (2015, pp. 171-173) saw self-esteem as essentially having four components: the material self (the body and possessions), the social self (the personality presented to other people), the spiritual self (the stream of consciousness, and the observer of subjective experience); and the pure ego (a person’s individuality and self-concept in solitude). Furthermore, Branden (1988) cited in Mahendran (2015, p. 161) defined the term self-esteem as having two main feelings: “personal competence” and “personal worth”. 

    After the self-esteem political movements of the 1980s and 1990s, and after Baumeister cited in Mahendran (2015, p. 162) officially promoted self-esteem as being the key to health and happiness, more and more people began to get in touch with this aspect of themselves consciously. Moreover, the concept of self-esteem gained a collective status, and became a central focus of social psychology. It was realised that self-esteem has intricate environmental and socio-cultural factors which are not always in the control of an individual (that is, that self-esteem  is at times a correlational phenomenon). All of this public attention to the subject led eventually to further concerns about whether collective self-esteem could be raised at all without first challenging the status quo. But why would this concept of self-love be relevant to forensic psychology? Branden (1988) cited in Mahendran (2015, pp. 160-161) described self-esteem as being the root of all psychological evils; including crime, mental health problems, social problems, poor wellbeing, and even suicide: “I cannot think of a single psychological problem […] that is not traceable, at least in part, to the problem of deficient self-esteem”. What this perspective suggests is that self-esteem should be considered a basic need in civil society, rather than a privilege of  a selected few, or a future project. Moreover, Bull et al. (2012) explains that sexual offenders, for example, can often be motivated to offend by their low self-esteem (in psychoanalysis, the ID); and often rely on cognitive biases to self-justify their behaviours and autobiographical discourses (impaired or deficient SUPEREGO). In view of such evidence, it is not surprising therefore that at some point a self-esteem deficit was considered to be a security risk, and this is why in 1986 the Task Force for Self-Esteem and Personal and Social Responsibility was established in the US California State Department cited in Mahendran (2015, p. 162), which promoted the deterrence and desistance from crime through interventions designed to increase morality and self-esteem levels in individuals. 

    Furthermore, in psychoanalysis the self is often referred to as a relational object, which has a personality that is presented to the outside world (the EGO; Eysenck, 2000); where identity is socially constructed  (Mahendran, 2015, pp. 188-190). A culture’s social norms and definitions of what is termed as “desirable” and “acceptable” impact on a person’s SUPEREGO*, and therefore their process of self-identification, as well as their object-relations are shaped by the dynamics between ID, EGO, and SUPEREGO. Burkitt (2008) cited in The Open University (2019) reinforces this idea about the self being relational within the social sphere: “Our self-worth is dynamic; it changes as we move through the world with our individual biographies”. One of the most influential approaches to understanding self-esteem was proposed by Rogers (1951) cited in Mahendran (2015, p. 174), who understood ‘self-fulfilment’ as the gap between the actual self (who we are) and the ideal self (who we want to be). By the same token, James (1952) cited in Mahendran (2015, p. 171) proposed a model claiming that self-esteem could be developed by manifesting the potential of one’s actual self into the ideal self, finding this way congruence within. Subsequently, Rogers also posited how in order for a person to mind this gap between the actual and ideal selves, they would have to let go of societal expectations and stereotypes. What all the above mentioned suggests is that self-actualisation, also known as self-realization (the capacity to reach one’s current maximum potential) relies on the individual challenging the status quo (Mahendran, 2015, p. 175). Indeed, exposure to unrealistic media stereotypes, for instance,  can influence individual and societal constructions of object identities and relations by setting manufactured personas as standards for what is desirable and competent (Kennedy, 2007). Blindly following or measuring oneself against such stereotypes can result in self-object dissatisfaction and therefore low self-esteem as a byproduct of the existing levels of inequalities, which reproduce all types of distortions related to the ontology of self-image presentation, and representation. Calogero (2013) cited in Mahendran (2015, pp. 192) proposed the system justification theory which sees activism as a healthy manifestation of self-love, because a person challenges the disproportionate general standards of what is considered nice. In other words, the way in which someone internalises the world around them- including the social, environmental, cultural, political and economic dimensions- influences self-esteem (Mahendran, 2015). 

    This would support the approach to understanding self-esteem as a cognitive attitude (e.g. internalisation of circumstances), and yet this would not be mutually exclusive with the idea of self-esteem as relational phenomena. Leary (2003) cited in Mahendran (2015, p. 180) proposed the sociometer theory, which posited that self-esteem levels can sometimes be attributed to external, rather than internal inputs. This theory highlights the importance of understanding object-relational dynamics. On the other hand, there are several cognitive biases which prevent people from maintaining a healthy level of self-esteem (Mahendran, 2015). For instance, an individual can make a fundamental attribution error if they assume that self-esteem is all about personal attitudes and has nothing to do with the milieu they live in (Mahendran, 2015, p. 180). This is why self-esteem should not be interpreted as belonging only to one single aspect of reality, but rather, it should be seen as a phenomenon that really permeates every aspect of a person’s life at all times; and is therefore subject to both, interoception and exteroception. Nevertheless, Pyszczynski et al. (2004) cited in Mahendran (2015, p. 181) proposed a somewhat nihilistic account of self-esteem where self-love is presumably used as a defence mechanism derived from denial about the brutal reality of death. What this suggests is that all approaches to understanding self-esteem have been a byproduct of the subconscious fear that the human individual has about the imminent probability of dying. Maslow’s and James’ models, for example, would be a byproduct of the subconscious need to distract the mind from the imminent reality of mortality. Consequently, Mruk (2006) cited in Mahendran (2015, p. 169) proposed a phenomenological definition of self-esteem which focused on the way in which a person tries to make sense of their day to day world, supporting the approach to understanding self-esteem as a cognitive attitude in relation to reality. He described it as a status which is lived, and which can be developed through time. This goes hand in hand with some of the approaches developed through humanistic psychology on the topic, such as the phenomenological accounts offered by Rogers, which focused on the holistic aspect of qualia (Mahendran, 2015, p. 174). 

    To summarise, there are several approaches to understanding self-esteem, and these are not always mutually exclusive. As it has been demonstrated, there are several different aspects that make and remake a person’s self-concept. Therefore, based on the above evidence, it can be said that self-esteem is both a cognitive and a relational phenomenon with direct relevance to forensic psychology when trying to understand the underlying causes of offence culture and offending behaviour.

    References

    Blackburn, R. (2005) The Psychology of Criminal Conduct, West Sussex, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 87-110.

    Bull, R., Cooke, C., Hatcher, R., Woodhams, J., Bilby, C. and Grant, T. (2012) Criminal Psychology: Beginners Guides, London, Oneworld Publications, pp. 186-207.

    Eysenck, M. W. (2000) Psychology: A Student’s Handbook, East Sussex, Psychology Press Ltd., pp. 16-41.

    Kennedy, B. M. (2007) ‘THINKING ONTOLOGIES OF THE MIND/BODY RELATIONAL’, in Kennedy, B. and Bell, D. (eds) CYBERCULTURES, 2nd edn, Oxon, Routledge, pp. 773-787.

    Mahendran, K.  (2015) ‘Self-esteem’, in Turner, J., Hewson, C., Mahendran, K. and Stevens, P.  (eds), Living Psychology: From the Everyday to the Extraordinary, Milton Keynes, The Open University, pp. 155-194.

    Online Etymology Dictionary (n.d) Esteem (v) [Online]. Available at https://www.etymonline.com/word/esteem (Accessed 22 November, 2019).

    The Open University (2019) ‘5.1 Beyond managing self-esteem’, DD210-19J Week 7: Self-esteem [Online]. Available at https://learn2.open.ac.uk/mod/oucontent/view.php?id=1467715&section=5.1 (Accessed 22 November 2019).