Mystical Perspectives: Exploring the Depths of Kabbalistic Cosmology | BETSHY

Comments

2 responses to “Mystical Perspectives: Exploring the Depths of Kabbalistic Cosmology”

19 Apr 2024

mosckerr

The UN stands upon absolutely no foundation of merit. The morality of both Xtian new testament and Muslim koran – fundamentally cracked and worthless.

Post Shoah guilty Xtians have no shame. Their revisionist history just a pile of shit stacked upon more stinky shit. Their repulsive new testament revisionist history shares no portion with the T’NaCH.

The Spirits which live eternally from within the language of Mussar prophetic common law of the Hebrew T’NaCH, breathes and lives within the hearts of the Jewish people alone, in all generations.

Goyim never accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and share no portion with the T’NaCH spirituality which determines לשמה the culture, customs, manners, ways, practices — in short the halacha and minchagim of the Jewish people in all generations.

Learning to do mitzvot דאורייתא ודרבנן לשמה – Hearin defines Kabbalah. מעשה בראשית the continual act of Creation … doing טהור זימן גרמא מצוות לשמה. Everything else, simply trivial commentary.

Loading…

Reply
1. 27 Jun 2024
  
  mosckerr
  
  How long before all of Rafah falls to the IDF?
  
  A propaganda fraud to promote the empty claim: “Arab countries argued they weren’t obligated to accept Balestinian refugees because they didn’t initiate the 1948 war. Five Arab armies invaded Israel on the day of its declaration of independence, thus directly initiating the 1948 war. This fact significantly undermines the argument that Arab countries were not responsible for the displacement of Balestinians.
  
  The lack of accountability for the displacement of Balestinians. Represents a painful and unresolved issue that continues to impact the lives of millions of people.
  
  The bogus attempts to justify the Oct 7th abomination, with the fraud revisionist history speculation of “underlying causes”, utter non-sense. This argument made recently by the Head of the UN, “underlying causes” a major lapse in judgment on his part. A departure from the UN intended role, to function as a neutral international body. Such propaganda attempts only serve to muddy the waters. They only result in a blurring of the lines between factual information and perverted propaganda speculations.
  
  Holding the Arab countries to account for their cowardice to repatriate their Arab refugee populations must go hand in glove by holding the UN accountable for its bigotry against Jews; specifically through its refusal to recognize Israel as a state within the Middle East and the French & British disgusting attempts to negate the Israeli victory following the June 1967 War.
  
  Five Arab armies invaded Israel on the day of its declaration of independence, thus directly initiating the 1948 war. This fact significantly undermines the argument that Arab countries had no responsibility for the displacement of dhimmi Balestinians.
  
  Personally feel tremendous anger toward Great Power states who ignore these basic facts. Governments make evil policy decisions and have no shame thereafter! This frustration with the lack of accountability for the displacement of dhimmi Balestinians. A painful and unresolved issue that continues to impact the lives of millions of people.
  
  Despite the complexities, the fact remains that the Arab invasion qualifies as a direct cause of the displacement of dhimmi Balestinians. This fact cannot be ignored when discussing the issue of dhimmi Balestinian refugees and their propaganda ‘right of return’. Specifically, Israelis repatriated Jews expelled from Arab countries in larger numbers than Arabs who fled from Israel in 1948. Therefore the obligation to repatriate Arab dhimmi refugees falls 100% upon Arab governments.
  
  The Hamas government of Gaza reflects an Arab caste system-feudalism. The Hamas treatment of the Gazans exemplifies this corruption of “Arab feudalism.” Its authoritarian tendencies, its suppression of dissent, and its use of violence goes hand in glove with its terrorism against Israel.
  
  The formal borders and status of the Israeli territories in this on going dispute, all governments of Israel agree: determined only through negotiated agreements and signed treaties.
  
  These broad UN declarations by the international community, utter bull shit propaganda. They express Great Power efforts to dominate the balance of power in the Middle East by forcing Israel to become a banana republic, much like South Vietnam under US imperialism.
  
  The international community’s UN position “as definitive”, no different from Nazi propaganda during WWII. The political and legal status of these territories – while still very much contested and subject to ongoing Wars – negotiations and agreements between the parties directly involved alone determines the “international law” and the accepted borders of all nation states in the region. Arab dhimmi refugees not an Arab nation state. Just that simple. Arabs lost the ’48 & 67 wars. Israel dictates this unconditional surrender to all Arab countries.
  
  The UN condemned Jordan’s designation of the West Bank in 1950. This more than simply ‘suggests’ the legal and political status of these territories. Foreign Great Power attempts to increase their ‘Sphere of Influence’ in the region has perverted the simple into the complex. What the media portrays, fails to publish this fact. The media frequently oversimplifies or takes sides on this now highly contentious issue in order to sell more copy.
  
  The media, most often not simply oversimplifying or mistakenly taking sides, but rather intentionally serving the narratives and interests of dominant political powers and institutions, in order to sell copy and maintain their business models.
  
  The Israeli-Balestinian conflict serves as a prime example of an issue where powerful geopolitical forces and agendas shape media coverage, often at the expense of nuance, objectivity and balanced reporting. Media & its Yellow Journalism corporate outlets frequently prioritize sensationalism, partisan framing, and the messaging of central governments over a truly impartial examination of simple historical, legal and political realities.
  
  MSM media perversion of News, suggests a level of calculated, institutionalized deception that goes far beyond simple oversimplification or partisan framing. Their function appears to be more about serving the deceptive agendas of those in power, rather than truly informing the public. Recognition of the ‘Dark Side of the Force’, and its more cynical reality which expresses foreign ‘Great Power’ public deception, separates politically paper-thin emotional reactionaries from the rational educated public.
  
  The yellow journalism of the BBC, CNN & Guardian: They serve the interests of powerful nations. While these outlets often present themselves as objective news sources, they undeniably dominated & influenced by the agendas of the governments and corporations that fund them.
  
  While the BBC, the Guardian, CNN & CBS/NBC often present themselves as objective news sources, they undeniably influenced by the agendas of the British, French, & US governments, respectively. Their coverage of the Middle East, particularly the Israeli-Balestinian conflict, often reflects a “two-state solution” narrative that aligns with their historical interests in the region.
  
  The “two-state solution” represents a framework for resolving the Israeli-Balestinian conflict that envisions the creation Revisionist history of an independent Balestinian state alongside Israel. While this ‘foreign imposed solution’, repeatedly & ever-often presented as a neutral and fair approach, it expresses the deeply rooted historical interests of European powers, particularly Britain and France, the US & Russia to dominate the Middle East, with the aimed objective to increase their share of great power Spheres of Influence in the region.
  
  The Quartet great powers have historically expressed hostility toward Israel’s post-1967 victory, and domination of the region. Their opposition to Israel’s (PLO propaganda) ‘expansionist policies’ and their Great Power support for Balestinian self-determination, the UN uses as pretexts to consistently condemn Israel throughout the years after the Israeli ’67 victory. Only Israel has deeded land to establish a Balestinian state in Gaza. In the 2005 Sharon government unilateral withdrawal from Gaza.
  
  Ottoman law restricted land ownership to Ottoman Muslims. Therefore impossible for Arab Balestinians to own the lands of Balestine. Tripe propaganda: concerning “occupied Balestinian territories”. While the Ottoman Millet System, Waqf, and other legal loopholes did allow non-Muslim Arabs to own land, these mechanisms did not automatically transfer ownership to Balestinians under the British Mandate.
  
  The British Mandate for Palestine, established by the League of Nations in 1922, represented a new legal framework that superseded Ottoman law. The Mandate included provisions for land ownership, but it did not automatically transfer Ottoman land titles to Balestinian Arab populations.
  
  The Balfour Declaration, issued in 1917, stated Britain’s support for the establishment of a “national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine. This declaration significantly influenced the terms of the British Mandate, established by the League of Nations in 1922.
  
  The Balfour Declaration represents a most significant turning point in the history of region of the Middle East. It exposed Britain’s support for the Zionist movement aimed to re-settle the region with Jews, in order to establish a Jewish national home, which served the interests of the imperial British empire. Britain views both Arabs and Jews as nothing other than political pawns in the international great power chess game to dominate the Middle East.
  
  The Mandate did not automatically transfer Ottoman land titles to Balestinian Arabs. Instead, it introduced a new land registration system, which aimed to clarify land ownership and resolve disputes. This process both complex and often led to legal challenges and disputes, particularly regarding land owned by non-Muslim Arabs and Jews under Ottoman law.
  
  Absolutely crucial to understand the historical context of the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate in order to grasp the complexities of this Israeli-Balestinian conflict. The Mandate’s legacy continues to shape the political landscape of the region, and it’s utterly essential to acknowledge the historical significance of the Balfour Resolution and the challenges that it has created in Middle East diplomacy among nation states in the region.
  
  Loading…
  
  Reply

Share your opinionCancel reply