BETSHY

Tag: Holocaust

  • Understanding Subconscious Jewish Deicide Resentment

    Understanding Subconscious Jewish Deicide Resentment

    As we delve into the history of anti-Semitism and the tragic events of the Holocaust, we must also examine the underlying beliefs and attitudes that have fuelled such hatred towards the Jewish people for centuries. One particularly unsettling aspect of this phenomenon is the concept of subconscious Jewish deicide resentment.

    Advertisements

    The term “deicide” specifically refers to the killing of a god. Jewish deicide resentment refers to the belief that Jews are collectively responsible for the death of Jesus Christ. This belief has a long and troubling history within Christian theology, leading to centuries of discrimination , persecution, and violence against Jewish communities. This collective blame has been passed down through generations, leading to a deep-seated animosity towards Jews. While this belief is no longer officially endorsed by many mainstream Christian denominations, the legacy of anti-Semitic attitudes and actions persists.

    In modern times, this historical thirst for justice based on subconscious resentment has taken on a more insidious form. While explicit accusations of killing God may not be as prevalent today, the underlying belief that the Jewish people are somehow responsible for the world’s problems still persists. This can be seen in conspiracy theories that blame Jews for controlling the media, the banking system, and even orchestrating global events to further their own agenda. This subconscious resentment can manifest in various ways, from subtle microaggressions to more overt forms of discrimination.

    One example of modern subconscious Jewish deicide resentment can be seen in the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes about Jews. These stereotypes often portray Jews as greedy, cunning, and deceitful – traits that can be traced back to the historical trope of Jews as “Christ-killers.” While many people may not explicitly connect these stereotypes to the idea of Jewish deicide, the underlying resentment and suspicion towards Jews can still be present.

    Another example of modern subconscious Jewish deicide resentment is the reluctance to acknowledge and confront anti-Semitism within society. Issues such as Holocaust denial, conspiracy theories, and hate speech against Jews continue to persist, yet some individuals may downplay or dismiss these concerns, revealing a deeper underlying prejudice towards Jews. For instance, the rise of white nationalism and neo-Nazism has only exacerbated this issue, with extremists using the age-old tropes of Jewish deicide to justify their hateful actions. The tragic events of the Holocaust serve as a chilling reminder of what can happen when these beliefs are allowed to fester and grow unchecked.

    It is crucial that we recognise and confront the roots of this issue. It is important for individuals to educate themselves on the harmful effects of subconscious Jewish deicide resentment and work towards challenging and dismantling these attitudes. By promoting understanding, empathy, and respect towards all individuals, regardless of their religious or cultural background, we can create a more inclusive and accepting society for everyone. By challenging these harmful stereotypes and prejudices, we can improve the world.

    In conclusion, while the overt belief in Jewish deicide may have waned in mainstream Christianity, the legacy of resentment and prejudice towards Jews still lingers in our subconscious. As we continue to educate ourselves on the history of anti-Semitism and work towards combating these destructive beliefs, we must also strive to promote empathy, tolerance, and acceptance in our communities. Only then can we truly move towards a future free of hatred and prejudice.

  • How Nietzsche Influenced the Nazi Holocaust

    How Nietzsche Influenced the Nazi Holocaust

    Friedrich Nietzsche, the German philosopher known for his existentialist ideas and critiques of traditional morality, has often been associated with the rise of Nazism and the atrocities committed during the Holocaust. While Nietzsche himself did not endorse the genocide and antisemitism of the Nazis, his ideas were misinterpreted and distorted by the regime to justify their brutal actions.

    Advertisements

    Nietzsche’s concept of the “will to power” and his rejection of Christian morality were seized upon by Nazi leaders such as Adolf Hitler and Joseph Goebbels to promote their ideology of racial superiority and the domination of weaker nations. The Nazis believed in the idea of a superior Aryan race that was destined to rule over others, a concept that was influenced by Nietzsche’s ideas of the Ubermensch, or “superman”, who transcends traditional values and creates his own morality.

    Furthermore, Nietzsche’s emphasis on the importance of individualism and the pursuit of personal greatness was twisted by the Nazis into a justification for their ruthless pursuit of power and control. They saw themselves as the embodiment of Nietzsche’s ideal of the strong and independent individual who is above conventional morality and able to shape their own destiny.

    However, it is important to note that Nietzsche himself was critical of nationalism, anti-Semitism, and the idea of a master race. He saw these beliefs as signs of societal decay and a threat to human progress. In fact, Nietzsche’s sister, Elisabeth Förster-Nietzsche, who had control over his writings after his death, twisted his ideas to further her own antisemitic and nationalist beliefs, which were then adopted by the Nazis.

    In conclusion, while Friedrich Nietzsche’s ideas did play a role in shaping the intellectual climate that led to the rise of Nazism, it is crucial to understand that his philosophy was not intended to promote violence, hatred, and discrimination. The Nazi regime deliberately distorted and misused his ideas to justify their crimes against humanity, and it is important to remember the true intent behind Nietzsche’s work to avoid such misinterpretations in the future.

  • The Role of Darwinism in the Nazi Holocaust

    The Role of Darwinism in the Nazi Holocaust

    The Nazi Holocaust is one of the most horrifying events in human history, resulting in the systematic murder of six million Jews and millions of others deemed undesirable by the Nazi regime. While there were multiple factors that contributed to the Holocaust, one ideology that played a significant role was Darwinism.

    Advertisements

    Darwinism, also known as social Darwinism, is the belief that certain groups or races are inherently superior to others and have a natural right to dominate or eliminate those deemed inferior. This ideology , derived from Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection, was twisted and used by the Nazis to justify their racist and genocidal policies.

    The Nazis believed in the concept of racial purity and sought to create a “master race” of Aryans, who they saw as the superior race. They believed that the Jews, along with other minorities such as Slavs, Romani people, and disabled individuals, were biologically inferior and posed a threat to the purity of the Aryan race.

    The Nazis used Darwinist ideology to dehumanise their victims and justify their mass extermination. They viewed the Holocaust as a form of natural selection, where the weak and undesirable were eliminated to strengthen the Aryan race. This belief in biological determinism fuelled their policies of ethnic cleansing, forced sterilisation, and ultimately, genocide.

    One of the most infamous examples of the Nazis using Darwinism to justify their actions was the concept of eugenics. Eugenics is the belief in improving the genetic quality of a population by controlling who is allowed to reproduce. The Nazis implemented eugenics policies such as forced sterilisation and euthanasia to eliminate those they deemed genetically inferior.

    Darwinism played a crucial role in shaping the racist ideology of the Nazis and justifying their heinous actions during the Holocaust. It provided a pseudo-scientific justification for their beliefs in racial superiority and the necessity of eliminating those they deemed inferior.

    While Darwinism was not the sole cause of the Holocaust, it undoubtedly played a significant role in shaping the thinking of the Nazi leadership and legitimising their genocidal policies. It serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of using science to justify hatred and discrimination, and the importance of critically examining the ideologies that can lead to such atrocities.

  • Corruption & Nazism at the Open University in the UK

    Corruption & Nazism at the Open University in the UK

    From 2019-2022 I studied forensic psychology with the Open University , and during my time there I experienced a series of attacks and attitudinal obstacles which added great tribulation to my already vulnerable life.

    Nazi IBM

    As someone diagnosed with mental health problems , I knew that studying an academic degree was not going to be easy; however, I never expected to experience the levels of fascism and even nazism emerging from the staff. Nazism? you may be asking, but that is exactly what they promoted through their curriculum.

    As someone who comes from a lineage of holocaust survivors, I felt in incredible pain when the university told me I had no choice but to get on with using (like everyone else) the IBM SPSS software. I explained to them that the company IBM was directly involved in the orchestration of the Jewish, European holocaust. Instead of responding empathically, a tutor critically said that my behaviour was ‘emotional‘ as if such was a negative human trait. It was and continues to be my impression that being callous and unemotional was the true social problem, not my behaviour.

    I asked them to please allow me to use Jamovi, a Linux-based alternative software which did all the work the IBM SPSS software did. They were extremely and oddly fixated on the brand IBM, more so than about the social repercussions the situation had on me. They decided to become authoritarian and banned me from the student forums; and eventually they refused to educate me or to allow me to finish my degree with them.

    Needless to say, I was shattered, and to this day I am still recovering from the Nazi traumas they imprinted on my soul forever. All I wanted was to become a forensic psychologist. Nevertheless, they were nazi, cruel, and callous in every single one of their decision-making processes; ultimately leaving a Jew in limbo and consciously breaching a vulnerable individual’s human right to education in the process without any empathy or remorse. Perhaps that’s how they teach their students about psychopathy; that is, by becoming themselves the destructive force which ruins lives.