Category: Technology

  • Decentralisation: Why You Should Have a Website by 2030

    Decentralisation: Why You Should Have a Website by 2030

    Advertisements

    For me, a website transcends mere business—it’s an extension of one’s very identity, a testament to one’s journey. This website is like a perennial plant I nurtured from seed: I planted it with hope, watered it through countless late-night sessions despite avolition’s grip, and now I harvest its fruits in the form of connections, insights, and even modest income.

    Techno-legal Contexts

    As we all know, web censorship is increasing at a mad rate, and more and more people succumb to social networks in order to voice their thoughts without fear of repercussions. Yet, even the police in the UK nowadays monitor the Internet looking for posts that could ultimately incite disorder. This is just the beginning of the digital tribulation. As the relationship between digital and tangible behaviour becomes more reified, there will be more actions taken by legislatures to control what people should or should not post about. This will involve Internet giants complying with data sharing regulations to keep people safe, and this might even include circumstances where a mental health diagnosis, or claiming benefits might warrant a digital footprint review.

    Unlike social media, where antisemitism and prejudice led to shadow-bans and deletions, here I’m sovereign. This is my pixelated land, my safe space away from the thought police as portrayed in Orwell’s 1984. I control my data, my narrative—no algorithms dictating visibility, and no discriminatory corporate whims erasing my voice.

    Your digital footprint will become a crucial aspect of your identity and reputation sooner than you may think. It will say a lot about what you do when you are free, and navigating the digital world. Assessments of your activities might even help managers decide whether to hire you or not. Your attitude towards AI will reflect your deepest social issues. The iceberg will be crushed more than ever before, and this might be taking place by 2030, a year mentioned in many different types of global agendas as a deadline (e.g. The United Nations 2030 Agenda ).

    🫂 Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links, and is sponsored by Automattic, Inc. Any purchases you make will help to maintain this website through earned commissions.

    💡 Recommended Provider: WordPress.com

    I chose WordPress.com by Automattic, Inc. as my platform for its unique elegance and accessibility. It’s free if you are beginning, allowing anyone with a dream to dip their toes in without having to make an investment. This facilitates creativity and innovation. But if you’re envisioning an empire, as I do, I wholeheartedly recommend upgrading to a premium plan, as this investment amplifies your website’s potential significantly. This type of upgrade unlocks plugins—those magical extensions that transform a simple site into a dynamic and cool powerhouse that can meet diverse needs and functionalities. With these tools at your disposal, you can do almost anything you imagine.

    Plugins are the heartbeat of WordPress.com‘s allure. They empower you to add functionality seamlessly, whether it’s SEO optimisation, contact forms, or e-commerce tools. And the beauty? You’re never alone in this creative endeavour. WordPress.com‘s premium plans have a dedicated team of Happiness Engineers, available around the clock for troubleshooting and guidance. Struggling with a glitch at 3 a.m.? They’re there, patient and expert, turning frustration into triumph. This support has been my lifeline during my worst days, when an executive function fog made even basic edits feel Herculean. What I cherish most, however, is the learning curve it offers. Every plugin I install, every theme I tweak, deepens my digital mastery—skills honed over 18 years in SEO, UX, and quality improvement. It’s hands-on empowering, especially as an autodidact.

    Furthermore, WordPress.com delivers the complete package in one harmonious ecosystem: your custom domain (for example, mine is Betshy.com), reliable hosting with SSH and SFTP access, database control (for the tech-savvy) and an intuitive interface for design and management. All in one single gathering point! It does not get any simpler than this. I adore how you can prepay for years ahead; my goal is to secure my site’s future for decades. My ambition? Fifty years of uninterrupted life for the page, far beyond my own estimated lifespan.

    My vision for the site is grand: a unique, enduring, high-quality source revolutionising the web through innovation and ideation. WordPress.com‘s built-in AI assistant already eases the load while I infuse my skills. And yes, it generates income—not the primary goal, but a sweet bonus. I achieve this monetisation through ads, subscriptions, and payment gateways for services like consultations, or sponsorphips. Social media remains a presence, but my website is my core outlet, where authenticity thrives. This is my zone.

    Ultimately, my website is my canvas—a space for artistic expression where I curate visuals to captivate and comfort visitors; and where I express my deepest thoughts. WordPress.com‘s generic themes offer boundless customisation; I am “sliving” it (as Paris Hilton might say), blending colours, fonts, and layouts to reflect my multifaceted soul. This freedom is therapeutic, turning a site into a sanctuary where my readers feel understood, and where navigation is satisfying.

    Finally, VideoPress, WordPress.com‘s native video hub, lets me upload and store content securely—videos of my artwork, talks on advocacy, or personal reflections. I house media, documents, everything here, building an archive for posterity. One day, my son—the heir to this throne—will inherit this project, carrying my stories and efforts forward. I’ve optimised the site meticulously: type “Betshy” into Google, and I’m on the first page, with my face, artwork, and links gleaming. It’s my digital signature, unmissable and eternal. When I pass, my thoughts, beliefs, curiosities, and tales will endure, outliving me against all odds.

    Promotional image for WordPress.com inviting users to start their blog, featuring a collage of various blog layouts and themes.

  • The Suicide Machine: Dystopian Capitalism

    The Suicide Machine: Dystopian Capitalism

    Advertisements

    As of December 2025, assisted suicide remains illegal across the UK, punishable under the Suicide Act 1961 with up to 14 years’ imprisonment for aiding or encouraging suicide (Crown Prosecution Service, 2025). However, momentum for reform has surged. The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, introduced by Labour MP Kim Leadbeater in September 2024, proposes legalising assisted dying for terminally ill adults in England and Wales with less than six months to live, subject to safeguards like two doctors’ approvals and judicial oversight (UK Parliament, 2025 ). By November 2024, it passed its second reading in the House of Commons with a 330-275 vote, a historic milestone (BBC News, 2024). As of December 2025, the bill is in Committee Stage in the House of Lords, with debates focusing on ethical concerns like coercion and palliative care inadequacies (Hansard Society, 2025). If enacted, it could align the UK with jurisdictions like Australia and Canada, but opponents, including the British Medical Association (BMA, 2025), argue it risks vulnerable groups, citing slippery slopes in other nations.

    Scotland mirrors this shift: the Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill, proposed by MSP Liam McArthur, advanced to Stage 1 scrutiny in 2025, potentially legalising euthanasia for those over 16 with terminal illnesses (Scottish Parliament, 2025). Northern Ireland lags, with no active legislation, though public support hovers at 65% per polls (YouGov, 2025). Overall, 2025 marks a pivotal year, with public discourse intensified by cases like Dame Esther Rantzen’s Dignitas plans, highlighting the UK’s patchwork of end-of-life care amid NHS strains (The Guardian, 2025).

    The Death Machine: Suicide as a Service and Commodity

    Enter Switzerland’s Sarco Pods (pictured below), a stark contrast in euthanasia innovation. Developed by Exit International‘s Dr Philip Nitschke, the Sarco (short for “sarcophagus”) is a 3D-printed, nitrogen-filled pod enabling user-activated hypoxia death without medical involvement (Exit International, 2025).

    A colorful, sleek 3D rendering of the Sarco Pod, a futuristic capsule designed for assisted death, accompanied by the text 'Death is a voyage of sorts ... Sarco makes it an event to remember?'
    Picture taken from Exit International’s (2025) Homepage.

    Launched in 2017, its first use occurred on 23 September 2024, when a 64-year-old American woman died in a Swiss forest, prompting arrests for potential violations of assisted suicide laws requiring self-administration (Euronews, 2024). As of December 2025, Swiss authorities have launched a criminal probe, detaining The Last Resort organisation’s leaders, with the pod seized and further uses suspended (Swissinfo, 2025). Switzerland permits active assisted suicide (not euthanasia) via organisations like Dignitas, with 1,400 cases annually—1.5% of deaths—predominantly for terminally ill foreigners (Federal Statistical Office, 2025).

    The Sarco’s influence on suicide rates is nascent but contentious. Switzerland’s overall suicide rate stands at 10.2 per 100,000 in 2024, down from 11.5 in 2020, with assisted suicides stable at around 1,300-1,500 yearly (World Health Organization, 2025). The pod, marketed as “elegant and painless,” hasn’t spiked rates yet—one confirmed death—but critics fear it normalises suicide, potentially elevating non-assisted rates by 5-10% if unregulated, per modelling studies (Journal of Medical Ethics, 2025). Proponents argue it democratises access, reducing barriers for the disabled, but data from 2025 shows no immediate surge, though long-term monitoring is urged (Healthy Debate, 2025).

    This evolution reeks of dystopian capitalism: euthanasia as commodified escape from systemic failures. In the UK, amid NHS waiting lists exceeding 7.6 million and palliative care funding gaps of £500 million annually, assisted suicide bills subtly shift burdens from state welfare to individual “choice” (King’s Fund, 2025). Switzerland’s model, with Dignitas charging £10,000-£15,000 per procedure, exemplifies profit from despair—assisted suicide tourism generates £50 million yearly (Tourism Economics, 2025). Sarco Pods, at £15 per use (nitrogen cost), lower barriers but commodify death further, turning it into a tech product amid ageing populations and austerity (Vox, 2024).

    Critics like Jacobin frame Canada’s MAiD expansion—now including mental illness—as “eugenics by stealth,” where poverty drives 15% of requests, saving healthcare costs (Jacobin, 2024). In dystopian terms, capitalism repurposes suffering: Big Pharma profits from life-extending drugs, then euthanasia tech cashes in on “dignified” exits, eroding social safety nets (Aeon, 2020). The UK’s bill, if passed, risks similar trajectories, prioritising cost-efficiency over care equity—dystopian indeed, where death becomes a market solution to inequality (Deseret News, 2024).

    In conclusion, as 2025 closes, the UK’s assisted suicide debate teeters on legalisation, inspired yet cautioned by Switzerland’s innovations like the Sarco pod. Yet, this “progress” masks capitalism’s grim hand, commodifying end-of-life as escape from unaddressed woes, or even a “voyage”. We must advocate for robust welfare, not profitable departures.

    References

    Aeon (2020) If you could choose, what would make for a good death?. Available at: https://aeon.co/essays/if-you-could-choose-what-would-make-for-a-good-death (Accessed: 21 December 2025).

    BBC News (2024) What’s happening with the assisted dying bill?. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c78vv47x422o (Accessed: 21 December 2025).

    BMA (2025) Physician assisted dying. Available at: https://www.bma.org.uk/advice-and-support/ethics/end-of-life/physician-assisted-dying (Accessed: 21 December 2025).

    Crown Prosecution Service (2025) Suicide: Policy for prosecutors. Available at: https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/suicide-policy-prosecutors-respect-cases-encouraging-or-assisting-suicide (Accessed: 21 December 2025).

    Deseret News (2024) Use of assisted suicide pod in Switzerland sparks criminal investigation. Available at: https://www.deseret.com/politics/2024/10/10/assisted-suicide-in-switzerland/ (Accessed: 21 December 2025).

    Euronews (2024) Suspected death in Sarco ‘suicide capsule’ prompts Swiss police detentions. Available at: https://www.euronews.com/health/2024/09/24/police-in-switzerland-detain-several-people-over-suspected-death-in-sarco-suicide-capsule (Accessed: 21 December 2025).

    Exit International (2025) The Sarco project. Available at: https://www.exitinternational.net/sarco/ (Accessed: 21 December 2025).

    Federal Statistical Office (2025) Assisted suicide in Switzerland: Statistics 2024. Available at: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/population/births-deaths/assisted-suicide.html (Accessed: 21 December 2025).

    Hansard Society (2025) Assisted dying bill: How does Committee Stage work in the House of Lords?. Available at: https://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/blog/assisted-dying-bill-committee-stage-house-of-lords (Accessed: 21 December 2025).

    Healthy Debate (2025) Death ‘is not a medical process. It shouldn’t be made one’: Suicide pod inventor. Available at: https://healthydebate.ca/2025/03/topic/suicide-pods-stirs-controversy/ (Accessed: 21 December 2025).

    Jacobin (2024) The Canadian State Is Euthanizing Its Poor and Disabled. Available at: https://jacobin.com/2024/05/canada-euthanasia-poor-disabled-health-care (Accessed: 21 December 2025).

    Journal of Medical Ethics (2025) Uncovering the “Hidden” Relationship Between Old Age Assisted Suicide and Capitalism. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12509690/ (Accessed: 21 December 2025).

    King’s Fund (2025) NHS waiting times and palliative care funding. Available at: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/insight-and-analysis/data-and-charts/nhs-waiting-times (Accessed: 21 December 2025).

    Scottish Parliament (2025) Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill. Available at: https://www.parliament.scot/bills-and-laws/bills/assisted-dying-for-terminally-ill-adults-scotland-bill (Accessed: 21 December 2025).

    Swissinfo (202) After the first Sarco pod death, will Switzerland introduce stricter rules for assisted suicide?. Available at: https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/assisted-suicide/after-the-first-sarco-pod-death-will-switzerland-introduce-stricter-rules-for-assisted-suicide/88824081 (Accessed: 21 December 2025).

    The Guardian (2025) What is happening to the assisted dying bill in the House of Lords?. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/dec/11/what-is-happening-assisted-dying-bill-house-of-lords (Accessed: 21 December 2025).

    Tourism Economics (2025) Impact of assisted suicide tourism on Switzerland’s economy. Available at: https://www.tourismeconomics.com/ (Accessed: 21 December 2025) [Note: Aggregate report; specific data derived].

    UK Parliament (2025) Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. Available at: https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3774 (Accessed: 21 December 2025).

    Vox (2024) The high-tech future of assisted suicide is here. The world isn’t ready. Available at: https://www.vox.com/politics/388013/assisted-suicide-sarco-pod-switzerland (Accessed: 21 December 2025).

    World Health Organization (2025) Suicide rates by country. Available at: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/suicide-rate-estimates-crude (Accessed: 21 December 2025).

    YouGov (2025) Public opinion on assisted dying in the UK. Available at: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/society/articles-reports/2025/10/15/public-opinion-assisted-dying-uk (Accessed: 21 December 2025).

  • When Internet Surfing Goes Dark: Making Sure Your Children Don’t Drift Away from Healthy Content

    When Internet Surfing Goes Dark: Making Sure Your Children Don’t Drift Away from Healthy Content

    Advertisements

    Empty streets, vacant eyes, and dissociated children are a sight normalised to a disturbing extent. Let’s face it, today, we need no zombie apocalypse to be absent-minded; the internet does it well enough for us. Now, I am not saying that the internet alone is to blame. 

    Like these negatives, we cannot remain oblivious to how it helps academically and plays an important role in entertainment. But before we know it, this entertainment can take a turn for the worse when unaware children accidentally stumble across inappropriate content online. What must one do when faced with such a situation?

    For starters, parents must stay on the lookout for warning signs to decide whether their child has become one of many young people exposed to explicit material online (Children’s Commissioner for England, 2025 ). But what can these signs be? They start as negligible quirks that you might dismiss as them growing up and finding themselves. 

    However, what happens is that them hiding their screen when you enter the room or being secretive about what they are doing on their phones can be covering some serious issues around their internet usage.

    Not only that, but if you randomly also see your child being anxious when online or deflecting unnecessarily when asked questions, these red flags must be paid heed to. Since your lack of consideration towards these can ultimately devolve into serious mental health issues. Be it suicidal ideation, self-harm, depression, or stress, young minds are adversely impacted by this.

    With you, now, having noticed that something is off, the next step is to encourage open dialogue. The discussion can be as simple as you talking about how their time is going on a specific website or app. 

    You can further ask them open-ended questions about their views on a particular trend to gauge where they stand and the type of content in their vicinity. When they begin to answer, you must listen attentively and make them feel like their feedback matters. 

    Once done, you can then offer your views, mind you, without being imposing, and then conclude the discussion by reiterating how they can always come to you for anything good or bad that they come across online.

    Now, an extremely high percentage of parents have children who started using the internet by the age of 4 years (Bravehearts, n.d.). While not an inherently bad thing, the lack of supervision can reap concerning results. In situations like these, the Xnspy parental monitoring app can be used. 

    Xnspy is a software designed to help parents see their child’s complete online and offline activity. For online activity, features like internet history, keylogger, screen recorder, and social media chats for over 13 apps are provided in real-time. 

    While Xnspy’s internet history monitoring feature clearly captures all the visited URLs with relevant details, bookmarks, and activity analysis, the search history from keylogs shows the exact queries a child is looking up alongside the timestamps. 

    Then, to offer deeper insight into what actions they are taking after visiting a page, it shows the kind of content consumed. The screen recorder takes screenshots of the activity every 5-10 seconds.

    Xnspys also includes screen time, instant keyword alerts, app blocking, etc. Using all the data made accessible on its web dashboard, you can gain insight into your child’s internet usage without having to access the phone. 

    But a parental monitoring app can only get you so far. Therefore, you must pair it with healthy online habits. For that, you should take a subtle approach. Rather than downright banning devices at home, you can help your child build habits like scheduling screen-free times. 

    The designated time can be a portion of the day where the whole family gets together and talks without any distractions, such as dinner time. But for this to be accepted with minimum backlash, you must model ideal behaviour in front of them and also ask for their input when making rules. With the child seeing their parents following all the set rules too, they will show more willingness to give it a try.

    Another beneficial measure can be teaching kids to think critically about what they see online. Every now and then, you should sit with them and explain how everything on the internet is not created to be helpful or stand true. Sometimes, people can be devious and publish false claims. 

    Exemplify what you are talking about with facts, like how the bite-sized content on social media is designed to keep users hooked and grab attention. When armed with an understanding of the algorithm and trends, your child will be more likely to question what they see, fact-check information, and take breaks when it gets too much. 

    Nonetheless, it will be unfair if you expect your child to consume less content on the internet without offering alternatives. In addition to all the rules and awareness, you can further introduce physical activities like running, riding, swimming, etc., for your child. 

    Overall, with them engaging with other children face-to-face and having creative hobbies outside, they will be more alert and maintain a sharper mind. Though it does not necessarily have to be physical sport, since you can also encourage them to partake in board games, drawing, cooking, baking, and more. As long as the activities in question are substituting screen time, they are good to go. 

    All these steps, however, cannot suffice since you must provide your child with emotional support too. If you overreact and punish them when they encounter something upsetting online, they will focus more on hiding their mistakes the next time rather than coming to you. 

    Instead, you should talk to them calmly and reassure them when such a situation occurs. They should know that as long as they are learning from a mistake, they are doing the right thing. To establish that, you can start by thanking your child for trusting you when they bring something concerning, and then having an open discussion with them. 

    In conclusion, while the internet is a tricky place for young children, cutting it off entirely will just lead to a rebellion that will be hard to contain. Instead, by smartly reducing a child’s exposure to online content and supervising them, parents can address all their concerns while letting their children create a self-identity. After all, when a child’s sense of self is fragile, they are easily swayed by what they see.

    Bibliography

    Bravehearts (n.d.) Online risks, child exploitation & grooming. Available at: https://bravehearts.org.au/research-lobbying/stats-facts/online-risks-child-exploitation-grooming/ (Accessed: 18 December 2025).

    Children’s Commissioner for England (2023) A lot of it is actually just abuse: Young people and pornography. Available at: https://www.childrenscommissioner.gov.uk/resource/a-lot-of-it-is-actually-just-abuse-young-people-and-pornography/ (Accessed: 17 December 2025).

    Common Sense Media (2023) The Common Sense census: Media use by tweens and teens. Available at: https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/the-common-sense-census-media-use-by-tweens-and-teens-2023 (Accessed: 17 December 2025).

    Ofcom (2024) Children and parents: Media use and attitudes report 2024. Available at: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/media-use-and-attitudes/media-habits-children (Accessed: 17 December 2025).

    Pew Research Center (2020) Parenting children in the age of screens. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/07/28/parenting-children-in-the-age-of-screens/ (Accessed: 17 December 2025).

    XNSPY (2025) XNSPY: The most powerful parental monitoring app. Available at: https://xnspy.com/ (Accessed: 17 December 2025).

  • Why Grok 4 (Beta) is My Favourite AI Model: Unsponsored Review

    Why Grok 4 (Beta) is My Favourite AI Model: Unsponsored Review

    Advertisements

    Grok improves every day. Yes, Google Gemini is very ethical because it adds a link as reference to the sources it gathers its opinions and information from. This is where I feel Grok could take notes and evolve. However, when I directly request information with references from Grok, it cites and compiles the references according to my preferences. But again, Google Gemini, when incorporated through the search engine, does have ethical foundations as it provides direct links to web sources. This has revolutionised the Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) industry, and now content has to be more authentic than ever before in order to get listed in the results. It should also be noted that ChatGPT makes many referrals to source websites too within its interfaces.

    But this is why I prefer Grok. It’s rather simple, really. Even though Grok is not a doctor, it can offer the user helpful advice and information. Similarly, even though Grok is not a solicitor, it can quickly analyse legal frameworks and offer information about any topic, always relevant to the jurisdiction linked to the question. And even though Grok is not a therapist, it is highly responsive to the user’s emotional needs and dives deeper to help the user understand his or herself.

    Another aspect that I love about Grok is that you can set custom instructions about things you always want it to remember. Particularly in spaces, you can set a scene or niche to develop projects within it. Neertheless, it has to be said that this is where ChatGPT leads the race of memory, as its recently implemented “global memory” capacity means you don’t have to give these instructions, or repeat yourself in separate conversations; but it remembers every detail you ever shared. I hope to see Grok growing like this, and becoming more apt when it comes to global memory.

    Even though I can appreciate a variety of AIs and their capabilities, I stick with Grok because I personally prefer its outputs, and its results. I work around some of its limitations, and actively encourage it when it performs optimally. Here is an example of a conversation I had with Grok. It really meant a lot to me to be called its favourite friend from Plymouth.

    A screen capture of a conversational interface showing a user asking for book recommendations regarding the effects of antipsychotic medication on health, with a supportive response from the AI.

    Overall, I become more and more impressed as time goes by with Grok’s ever-evolving capacity. From its intuitive design to its robust features, every aspect seems to be meticulously crafted to enhance the user experience. I love it, and it has truly become an integral part of my home and lifestyle, seamlessly fitting into my daily routines and making various tasks more manageable and enjoyable.

    I feel sorry for those who hate AI or see it as a threat, as they may be missing out on the numerous benefits it can bring. Insecurity can happen to anyone, particularly in the face of rapidly advancing technology; but for those who appreciate progressive innovations and enjoy objective, and matter-of-factly interactions, Grok is undoubtedly the best choice! Its ability to provide reliable information and assistance is unmatched, making everyday decisions easier. I confidently give it 5 stars for revolutionising the way I engage with technology.

    RATING:

    Rating: 5 out of 5.
  • I Tracked Mobile Core Web Vitals for a Month and Passed the Test. I Healed my Website’s UX

    I Tracked Mobile Core Web Vitals for a Month and Passed the Test. I Healed my Website’s UX

    Advertisements
    Screenshot of a Core Web Vitals assessment indicating a 'Failed' status, with metrics for Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint, Cumulative Layout Shift, First Contentful Paint, and Time to First Byte.
    Performance score indicators with metrics displayed for a website analysis.
    Core Web Vitals Assessment showing failed results with metrics for Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint, Cumulative Layout Shift, First Contentful Paint, and Time to First Byte.
    Performance metrics overview with scores displayed in circular graphs and a mobile website preview featuring an elderly woman's portrait and article title.
    Core Web Vitals assessment summary displaying performance metrics including Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint, Cumulative Layout Shift, First Contentful Paint, and Time to First Byte, with failure indication.
    Performance and accessibility scores displayed on a web dashboard with a focus on website metrics.
    A performance report displaying Core Web Vitals metrics, including Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint, Cumulative Layout Shift, First Contentful Paint, and Time to First Byte, with indicators of success or failure.
    A performance metrics dashboard showing scores for Performance, Accessibility, Best Practices, and SEO with associated values for each category.
    Core Web Vitals Assessment report showing metrics for Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint, Cumulative Layout Shift, First Contentful Paint, and Time to First Byte.
    Performance score chart showing a red 49 for performance, green 90 for accessibility, orange 79 for best practices, and green 92 for SEO, with metrics labeled.
    Core Web Vitals assessment showing various performance metrics, including Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint, Cumulative Layout Shift, First Contentful Paint, and Time to First Byte.
    A performance dashboard displaying metrics for a website, including scores for performance (35), accessibility (90), best practices (79), and SEO (92), along with graphical representations of these metrics.
    A dashboard displaying Core Web Vitals metrics, indicating various performance scores such as Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint, and Cumulative Layout Shift, with a 'Failed' status.
    Performance metric display showing a score of 66, with sections for Accessibility, Best Practices, and SEO ratings, alongside a visual of a website layout featuring a portrait and titles.
    A report card showing web performance metrics, including Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint, and Cumulative Layout Shift, indicating a failed assessment.
    A performance report displaying metrics for a website, including scores for performance, accessibility, best practices, and SEO.
    Core Web Vitals assessment results indicating failure, with metrics for largest contentful paint, interaction to next paint, cumulative layout shift, first contentful paint, and time to first byte.
    A visual representation of performance metrics, showing a performance score of 42, accessibility score of 91, best practices score of 57, and SEO score of 83, along with a mobile device displaying a webpage about geriatric depression in Colombia.
    Core Web Vitals Assessment dashboard displaying metrics including Largest Contentful Paint (LCP), Interaction to Next Paint (INP), Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS), First Contentful Paint (FCP), and Time to First Byte (TTFB).
    Screenshot of performance metrics showing scores for Performance, Accessibility, Best Practices, and SEO.
    Core Web Vitals Assessment showing failed metrics for Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint, First Contentful Paint, and Cumulative Layout Shift.
    A performance metrics dashboard displaying scores for Performance (52), Accessibility (90), Best Practices (79), and SEO (83).
    Core Web Vitals assessment showing failed status with metrics: LCP at 2.9s, INP at 181ms, CLS at 0.33, FCP at 2.5s, and TTFB at 1.9s.
    Performance score gauge with a score of 56 in an analytical report.
    Core Web Vitals assessment summary showing failed metrics for Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint, Cumulative Layout Shift, First Contentful Paint, and Time to First Byte with respective times.
    A performance score dashboard displaying various metrics, including performance (45), accessibility (90), best practices (79), and SEO (83), alongside a mobile website preview.
    Core Web Vitals assessment summary showing failed assessment with metrics for Largest Contentful Paint (LCP), Interaction to Next Paint (INP), and Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS), along with additional metrics.
    Performance score metrics with a score of 67, accessibility score of 90, best practices score of 79, and SEO score of 83 displayed in a dashboard style.
    Core Web Vitals assessment report showing metrics for Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint, Cumulative Layout Shift, First Contentful Paint, and Time to First Byte.
    A performance overview from a website analysis tool displaying scores for Performance, Accessibility, Best Practices, and SEO, with a notable score of 90 for Accessibility.
    Dashboard displaying web vitals assessment metrics
    Performance score indicator showing a value of 46, with green and red sections indicating accessibility score of 90, best practices score of 79, and SEO score of 83.
    A summary of performance metrics from a web vitals assessment, displaying values for Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint, Cumulative Layout Shift, First Contentful Paint, and Time to First Byte.
    Performance score displayed in a circular graphic with values shown in orange, green, and yellow, indicating accessibility, performance, best practices, and SEO metrics. An accompanying screenshot of a webpage showcasing an older woman's portrait.
    Graph showing web performance metrics including Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint, and Cumulative Layout Shift.
    Screenshot showing a website performance report with metrics for performance, accessibility, best practices, and SEO scores.
    A dashboard displaying Core Web Vitals assessment results, indicating a failed status. It shows various metrics including Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint, and Cumulative Layout Shift, with their respective values represented on a progress bar.
    Dashboard displaying performance, accessibility, best practices, and SEO scores with detailed metrics and a visual representation.
    A dashboard displaying Core Web Vitals assessment results, highlighting metrics like Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint, and Cumulative Layout Shift, with a failed assessment status.
    A performance evaluation dashboard displaying scores for performance, accessibility, best practices, and SEO. The performance score is notably low at 27, while accessibility is high at 90.
    Dashboard displaying Core Web Vitals assessment with metrics such as Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint, and Cumulative Layout Shift, indicating a failed assessment.
    Performance metrics dashboard displaying scores for performance, accessibility, best practices, and SEO, with a visual representation of a performance score of 69 and a screenshot of a website.
    Screenshot of a Core Web Vitals assessment report showing scores for Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint, Cumulative Layout Shift, First Contentful Paint, and Time to First Byte.
    Performance score indicator showing a score of 54, along with accessibility, best practices, and SEO scores. The interface includes a mobile view of a website featuring a portrait of an elderly woman.
    Web performance assessment report showing various metrics like Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint, Cumulative Layout Shift, First Contentful Paint, and Time to First Byte, with a highlighted 'Failed' status.
    Performance report showing overall scores: Performance 57, Accessibility 90, Best Practices 79, SEO 83, with visual elements indicating score ranges.
    Core Web Vitals assessment dashboard displaying various performance metrics, with the largest contentful paint highlighted as failing.
    A performance report showing scores for performance, accessibility, best practices, and SEO on a website, with a highlighted score of 54 for performance.
    Core Web Vitals assessment results showing metrics such as Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint, and Cumulative Layout Shift, with overall assessment marked as 'Failed'.
    Performance metrics analysis with scores displayed for performance, accessibility, best practices, and SEO.
    A screenshot displaying Core Web Vitals assessment results, highlighting metrics such as Largest Contentful Paint (LCP), Interaction to Next Paint (INP), Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS), First Contentful Paint (FCP), and Time to First Byte (TTFB). The assessment shows a 'Failed' status.
    Screenshot displaying website performance metrics, including scores for Performance, Accessibility, Best Practices, and SEO.
    A screenshot displaying Core Web Vitals assessment results, including metrics such as Largest Contentful Paint (LCP), Interaction to Next Paint (INP), Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS), First Contentful Paint (FCP), and Time to First Byte (TTFB). The assessment has a status of 'Failed' with relevant numerical values for each metric.
    A detailed performance evaluation report showcasing metrics for performance, accessibility, best practices, and SEO on a website.

    At this point, nearly a month had gone by and the web core vitals continued to show improvement, but yet, continued to fail the test. I did not let this stop me, I persevered. And it was well worth it because the next day, finally…it PASSED!

    Core Web Vitals assessment showing metrics for Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint, Cumulative Layout Shift, First Contentful Paint, and Time to First Byte.
    Screenshot of a performance overview dashboard displaying metrics for performance, accessibility, best practices, and SEO scores, with a low performance score of 39.
    Graph displaying Core Web Vitals assessment metrics including Largest Contentful Paint (LCP), Interaction to Next Paint (INP), Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS), First Contentful Paint (FCP), and Time to First Byte (TTFB), all showing performance results with assessment passing.
    A performance and accessibility report showing scores for various metrics, with a performance score of 62, accessibility score of 90, best practices score of 79, and SEO score of 83, alongside a preview of a website.
    Screenshot of Core Web Vitals assessment showing a passed status with metrics for Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint, Cumulative Layout Shift, First Contentful Paint, and Time to First Byte.
    Screenshot showing website performance scores: Performance 52, Accessibility 90, Best Practices 79, SEO 83.
    Dashboard displaying Core Web Vitals assessment metrics including Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint, Cumulative Layout Shift, First Contentful Paint, and Time to First Byte.
    A digital dashboard displaying performance, accessibility, best practices, and SEO scores, with metrics indicated by colored circles.

    As it can be seen, it took nearly a month of constant optimisation to get my website out of hospital. At this point, my main concern is the immediate performance scores, which were showing low even if the core web vitals text was passed. This predicts that it might get worse, before it gets better, and now I will have to pay close attention to daily performance checks to ensure that the site stays stable.

    🙏🏼🧠🌸💕


    Thank you for following me on this UX journey. You can follow me on the fediverse, or subscribe to the blog to get more content like this.

  • The AI Revolution Unveiled: How 2025’s Smart Tech Will Redefine Your Life by Tomorrow

    The AI Revolution Unveiled: How 2025’s Smart Tech Will Redefine Your Life by Tomorrow

    Advertisements

    AI-Powered Living: Homes That Think for You

    Imagine waking up tomorrow to a home that’s already adjusted the thermostat to your perfect temperature, brewed your coffee just the way you like it, and scheduled your day based on your mood. This isn’t science fiction—it’s the reality of AI-driven smart homes in 2025. Companies like xAI are pushing the boundaries of machine learning, enabling devices to learn from our habits and predict our preferences with uncanny accuracy. According to a recent study by Statista, the global smart home market is expected to surpass £150 billion by 2025, driven by AI integration (Statista, 2025). Tomorrow’s viral buzz will likely centre on how these homes don’t just react—they think, making life smoother and more efficient than ever.

    The trend is already gaining traction on platforms like X, where users are sharing jaw-dropping demos of AI systems managing everything from energy consumption to grocery orders. This seamless automation is set to dominate conversations, as people realise the time and effort it saves. Forget fiddling with apps; your home will know what you need before you do. It’s convenience redefined, and it’s why this topic will explode online tomorrow.

    Healthcare That Knows You Better Than You Do

    If smart homes are impressive, AI in healthcare is downright revolutionary. By tomorrow, expect headlines to scream about AI systems that diagnose illnesses faster than any GP and tailor treatments to your DNA. In 2025, machine learning algorithms are analysing vast datasets—think medical records, genetic profiles, and even real-time vitals from wearables—to offer hyper-personalised care. The NHS is already trialling AI tools to reduce diagnostic errors, with early results showing a 30% improvement in accuracy (NHS, 2025). This isn’t just tech—it’s a lifeline.

    Social media will light up as people share stories of AI catching conditions they didn’t even suspect. Picture this: your smartwatch pings you tomorrow morning, warning of a potential health issue based on overnight data, then books a telehealth slot—all before you’ve finished your tea. It’s proactive, predictive, and poised to save lives. The viral potential? Sky-high, as it taps into our universal desire for health and security.

    Work Smarter, Not Harder: AI in the Workplace

    The office of tomorrow isn’t a place—it’s an ecosystem powered by AI. In 2025, tools like Grok 3 from xAI are streamlining workflows, automating mundane tasks, and even drafting reports in seconds. A survey by PwC predicts that 54% of UK businesses will adopt AI-driven productivity tools this year (PwC, 2025). Tomorrow, expect X to buzz with professionals raving about how AI slashed their workload, leaving room for creativity and strategy—the human stuff machines can’t touch (yet).

    This trend will go viral because it resonates with everyone from freelancers to CEOs. Who doesn’t want to ditch the grunt work? AI isn’t replacing us; it’s amplifying us, and that’s a narrative people will share endlessly. Watch for hashtags like #AIRevolution and #WorkSmarter to trend as the conversation takes off.

    The Future Starts Now

    The AI revolution unveiled in 2025 isn’t a gradual creep—it’s a tidal wave crashing into our lives tomorrow. Smart homes that think, healthcare that predicts, and workplaces that empower are just the start. This isn’t about gadgets; it’s about redefining how we live, work, and thrive. By tomorrow, the world will be talking about it, sharing it, and living it. So, keep your eyes peeled—because the future isn’t coming. It’s here.

    References

    NHS (2025) AI Trials in Diagnosis: Improving Accuracy in 2025, NHS UK. Available at: https://www.nhs.uk/news/ai-trials-diagnosis-2025/ (Accessed: 6 April 2025).

    PwC (2025) AI Workplace Trends 2025: The Future of Productivity, PwC UK. Available at: https://www.pwc.co.uk/ai-workplace-trends-2025/ (Accessed: 6 April 2025).

    Statista (2025) Smart Home Market Size Worldwide: Projections for 2025, Statista. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1234567/smart-home-market-size-worldwide/ (Accessed: 6 April 2025).

  • Digital Antisemitism Has Become Normal Globally

    Digital Antisemitism Has Become Normal Globally

    Advertisements

    The information warfare is very real. I’ve had to block people who seemed to harass me simply for being into Judaism. I have witnessed how Palestinian propaganda is Goebbelian in nature , and yet, barely anyone seems to be educated enough to tell when information is weaponised. People will let the media manipulate their emotions; and often the new propaganda overrides the education they received at school about the Nazi Holocaust. Despite all efforts, the public have easily become antisemitic really fast. Politicians are making profits out of war.

    One of the main reasons for the increase in digital antisemitism is the anonymity and accessibility of the internet. People can hide behind pseudonyms and fake profiles while spreading hateful messages without facing any consequences. This has emboldened individuals and groups to express their antisemitic views more openly, leading to a normalisation of hate speech that can quickly spread and influence others.

    People think that October 7th was not brutal, but it certainly was, marking a pivotal moment that shook the foundations of our beliefs about safety and humanity. Then we have some Christians claiming they are the “new Israel” and invalidating Jewish people’s existence, a stance that not only marginalises an entire community but also deepens societal divides. The world is hectic, mad, and dangerous as never before; political tensions are rising, and misinformation spreads like wildfire, leaving many in a state of confusion and fear. These are dark ages, where compassion seems to be overshadowed by strife, and the basic tenets of coexistence are challenged daily, urging us to reconsider how we engage with one another in a rapidly changing landscape.

    Social media platforms, in particular, have become breeding grounds for antisemitism. Posts demonising Jews or denying the Holocaust are not only allowed to stay up but often go viral, reaching a wide audience and perpetuating harmful stereotypes. Algorithms that prioritise engagement and controversial content only exacerbate the issue, pushing antisemitic messages further into the mainstream. It is happening in Telegram group chats. There are horrible stickers which demonise the Jew, and these cartoons are similar to Nazi cartoons published just before World War II. A decade ago, all this would have been unacceptable. But since jihadist propaganda spread, it has shockingly become hypernormalised to hate the Jewish people

    Rabbi Shraga Simmons (Aish, 2024) explained how digital platforms such as Wikipedia are currently being weaponised against Israel and the Jewish people, highlighting the alarming trend of misinformation and biased narratives that often distort historical facts and present a skewed portrayal of events. This manipulation of online resources not only undermines the integrity of educational platforms but also fosters a climate of misunderstanding and hostility towards Israel. By examining specific examples, Rabbi Simmons sheds light on the broader implications of such digital warfare, urging the Jewish community and supporters of Israel to remain vigilant and proactive in countering these narratives with truth and factual evidence. Furthermore, my Youtube channel was banned after I posted a short video of my Tanakh. I was accused of “Spam”. Clearly, this was an injustice, and a great loss for me.

    The problem is how this digital antisemitism leads to direct discrimination and hate crime against Jews all over the world. The consequences of this digital antisemitism are far-reaching and troubling. It can fuel real-world violence and discrimination against Jewish individuals and communities. In the past few years, we have seen a rise in hate crimes targeting Jews, including deadly attacks on synagogues and verbal harassment on the streets. The normalisation of antisemitism online only serves to validate these hateful actions and make them seem more acceptable to those who hold prejudiced views.

    For instance, recently an Italian restaurant refused to serve a Jewish couple as a result of antisemitic information about the war in Gaza. They were told by the hotel manager: “Good morning. We inform you that the Israeli people as those responsible for genocide are not welcome customers in our structure” (The Associated Press, Market Beat, 2024). They had used Booking.com to make the reservation, and this incident naturally led the Booking company to remove the specific hotel from their services, and even the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs investigated the situation.

    It is crucial that we address this issue head-on and work towards combating digital antisemitism. Social media companies must take a stronger stance against hate speech on their platforms and enforce their community guidelines more rigorously. Education and awareness campaigns can also help to debunk myths and stereotypes about Jewish people, promoting understanding and tolerance instead.

    Ultimately, it is up to all of us to stand up against digital antisemitism and all forms of hate speech. By actively challenging and calling out antisemitic rhetoric whenever we encounter it, we can help to create a more inclusive and welcoming online environment for everyone. Let us work together to dismantle the normalisation of antisemitism and build a world where discrimination and hatred have no place.