There is corruption on LinkedIn. It’s something that goes on unnoticed by most, but exists nonetheless. In spite of noble efforts from some users, people’s attempts to get ahead in the professional world have been beset by a slew of frauds and scammers (the admins) who have resorted to using the social media platform for their own personal gain. This post will discuss the various trials LinkedIn users find themselves facing.
The first trial facing most LinkedIn users is the fact that freedom fighters are being silenced. Platforms like LinkedIn have implemented a measure to censor those who speak out against oppression or against major corporations and governments. For example, people who have posted about topics like Black Lives Matter or the Hong Kong protests often find their posts removed from their profiles and are blocked from sharing their messages. The solution to this issue is to take measures to ensure freedom of speech on the platform. This can be done by increasing penalties for those who attempt to silence voices of potential victims of de facto and de jure discrimination.
As an ambitious young lady, I had decided to take the plunge and venture into the professional job market. I was encouraged to join LinkedIn, a popular social media platform tailored specifically to job seekers. I was full of enthusiasm and thought I would use the platform to grow and thrive. Little did I know, the “LinkedIn Trials” I was about to embark on would be much more challenging than I had anticipated.In the beginning, it seemed very intimidating – the bright, sleek platform, full of promises and hopes of professional behaviour. But look at how they treat the least advantaged.
The past decade has seen a dramatic shift in how people communicate and consume news. Social media has allowed us to connect, share information, and join conversations in ways never before possible. Of all the social media options available, none has had more of an impact than Twitter.
By offering a platform that can be used to quickly spread information, organise events, and comment on current events, Twitter has become one of the most important and influential social media platforms. From politics to news, Twitter has become the go-to source for information and the main interface for global political debate and telegram-like dialogue.
Since Mr. Tweet bought Twitter, UX improved for the least advantaged. Not only has it become more immersive, and personalised, but it also has become more regulated, and algorithmic in order to increase the probabilities of justice. It has also become increasingly undeniable that Twitter has become an essential tool for businesses, journalists, governmental and non-governmental institutions, associations and so forth.
Most notable of all, Twitter has become a cultural phenomenon, becoming the primary channel for people all over the world to connect to one another comfortably, share ideas, and keep up with what is going on. Initially a social media platform, it has now become larger than just a few threads here and there. Once adopted by the majority, it started to thrive and become an influential medium that changed the way people interact with each other in the universal forum.
Even before the 21st century, it was clear that Twitter was on the rise and it was only a matter of time before it became a major messaging and communication tool. Twitter started out as a place where people could post 140-word messages, but it quickly moved on to being a platform that could be used to spread news and spark conversations. Nowadays, you can write essays from images you upload too. As its popularity grew, so did its features. However, the quickest and most successful of these features was its ability to hashtag. Through the hashtag system, it is possible to build public, glocal, systemic databases, and libraries.
Ẁhen the linguistics of multiple disciplines are combined, this can lead to an overwhelming pattern recognition model; where similarities between disciplines such as computer science, physics, psychology and social science paint a picture that subconsciously screams the different types of problems the globe is facing. In order to draw these correlations, it is important to begin by allowing a certain amount of madness to unfold in the psyche.
It is a hypercomplex world, with hypercomplex structures that were formerly classical under many contexts; such as economics, politics, and even theoretical physics. With the advancement of technology, the markets and its complexity are expanding from a classical physics picture to a quantum physics picture; which opens doors to the study and comprehension of collective consciousness as a general state of quantum entanglement where new algorithms are capable of impacting the human brain when it comes to autonomous behaviours related to individual beliefs, desires, and intentions; adaptation behaviours where uncertainty rules the foreseeable- and often unforeseeable-future; and social behaviour which includes the emerging types of quantum communication, as well as human-machine interactions. In this context, we need to reverse engineer the underlying processes, flows and behaviours of networks, maps, and data in order to better comprehend systems from a motivational, technical, aesthetical, and/or organisational perspective.
Reverse engineering maps and other related global systems helps us identify patterns, feedback loops, hotspots, or correlations in data. Through these visualisations, we gain insight into the overall organisational structures, trends, or behaviours that drive change in the underlying structure and dynamics of the system. Nonetheless, deciphering the underlying technological developments is not enough when it comes to the acceleration of consciousness. Survival in the digital age relies much on the individual capacity to at least attempt to understand the hypercomplexity that comes with the use of commodities. Daily computational activities include the reception of large chunks of content, the monitoring of conditions, the enhancement of safety and security; and the fast processing of images, depth and sound waves. Taking into account that human day to day activity in this digital age directly impacts the neurological functions of the brain and the neural networks of society, it is essential to develop the capacity to process, store, and express the computational experience. Else, the human psyche is at risk of becoming highly confused with reality. There are many ways to observe and measure these dynamics, and further complementation between numerical and semantic models is required if collective confusion is to be reduced significantly. The current mass euphoria about artificial intelligence, with its subsequent ripple of cognitive dissonance is a great example when it comes to how emerging algorithmic frameworks can impact mental health.
Therefore, a balanced approach of computer science mixed with clinical psychology is required to prevent overwhelming the masses with stochastic SEO or SEM. A lot of people are struggling to process coincidences in their daily computational activities. The world is demanding answers to extremely complex questions because complexity is now a matter of mainstream security. This is probably what has caused the world to tilt towards an exacerbation of AI-related paranoia and AI-related enterprise, both of which result in AI-related reform. Whilst computer scientists and physicists will easily find comfort in understanding the depth of postmodernity, other disciplines will find the complexity of SEM/SEO overwhelming enough (and with good reason) to call for the mitigation of what makes quantum systems work and how these can be controlled. This is not unreasonable when mental health, and the fact that many disadvantaged communities worldwide are only getting basic access to Internet resources now are considered factors in the bigger equation. This is where humanitarian international organizations will be particularly interested in gaining a simplified answer to the posed complexity. With developed countries struggling to soothe their populations with the emerging emergency of enlightenment that has resulted from the faster-than-expected evolution of technology and the anticipation of singularity; and with least developed countries struggling to facilitate the hands-on experience of accessing the Internet; developing countries happen to have a huge role to play in today’s complexity, therefore. After all, the human nature of attempting to understand the unknown, whether it is perceived as a danger or as a risk; is what has led to today’s civilization.
There is no definitive answer, as the effect of internal pingbacks on SEO ranking is not well understood. Some believe that they can be helpful, as they provide links to related content on your site. Others believe that they are not as useful, as they do not provide any new information to search engines.
Search engines’ algorithms are constantly changing and there is no way to know for sure how they currently weight internal pingbacks. However, it is generally believed that internal pingbacks do not have a significant effect on SEO ranking. In fact, some experts believe that internal pingbacks can help improve SEO ranking by signaling to search engines that a website is well-linked and relevant. Others believe that they have no impact whatsoever on SEO ranking. Furthermore, it is generally accepted that any links that point to a website, whether they come from pingbacks or other sources, can potentially help improve that website’s ranking. Since pingbacks create links between pages on a website, it is possible that they could indirectly affect SEO ranking by improving the linking structure of a website.Therefore, it is plausible that internal pingbacks could contribute to a higher ranking in search engine results pages.Ultimately, it is up to each individual site owner to decide whether or not to use internal pingbacks.